From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: brantley@coraid.com (Brantley Coile)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:17:04 -0500
Subject: [TUHS] Redoing "V6on286" or porting V7...?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511181259100.21811@static-141-149-129-16.buff.east.verizon.net>
References: <20051113201609.GW6574@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>	<8a61b612cf43394f33e6531339fe4263@coraid.com>	<20051114194946.GE6574@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0511161637001.14020@static-141-149-129-16.buff.east.verizon.net>	<17277.62390.986234.433543@hod.localdomain>
	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0511181259100.21811@static-141-149-129-16.buff.east.verizon.net>
Message-ID: <437EA740.8030109@coraid.com>

the mit stuff already has the back end and the assembler/loader.
the assembler for the pdp-11 was written by Dennis Ritchie and
is a wonder to behold.

   Brantley

Lyrical Nanoha wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Markus E Leypold wrote:
> 
> 
>>I wonder, wether you realize that getting pcc "ready" would mean
>>writing a x86 backend for it. Or does it already have one?
> 
> 
>>From what I heard it does, unless I misremembered...
> 
> -uso.
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/t uhs