From: Rod Bartlett via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>
To: Stuff Received <stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca>
Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: ATC'25 is the last ATC?
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 17:33:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439264E5-E266-4120-A735-0517D7CDB4DA@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43a0a867-522a-f953-c6c5-9be9383a6bd9@riddermarkfarm.ca>
U.S. Robotics had the best bonuses for filing patents of any company I've worked for. I think it was $1000 if they decided to file the patent application and another $1000 when it was granted. I also got an all expenses paid trip to Barcelona in 1999 for having filed 2 patents that year. Other companies were not nearly as generous.
- Rod
> On May 15, 2025, at 5:00 PM, Stuff Received <stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca> wrote:
>
> On 2025-05-14 10:54, Larry McVoy wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> It's a lot more than that, though. I was at IBM at that time, and at
>>> IBM, right about then the bonus for getting for getting published at a
>>> conference had gotten eliminated. It was very clear that as far as
>>> IBM management was concerned, conference publication didn't matter.
>>> If you filed a patent, you would get paid a cash bonus. If you submit
>>> to any conference --- you wouldn't.
>> That's wild. To the best of my knowledge, Sun didn't give you a bonus
>> for either a paper or a patent, it was just part of the job. I certainly
>> never got a bonus for that stuff. They did pay expenses for conferences
>> but that was it.
>
> We may be drifting off topic but my last employer paid $50 per application filed plus $100 per grant. My penultimate employer paid a lousy $1 (minimal required consideration).
>
> S.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-15 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 22:52 [TUHS] " Dan Cross
2025-05-07 2:11 ` [TUHS] " Alan Coopersmith via TUHS
2025-05-07 2:55 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] ` <20250514133336.GD9943@mit.edu>
[not found] ` <20250514145452.GE17185@mcvoy.com>
2025-05-14 19:16 ` Alan Coopersmith via TUHS
[not found] ` <43a0a867-522a-f953-c6c5-9be9383a6bd9@riddermarkfarm.ca>
2025-05-15 21:33 ` Rod Bartlett via TUHS [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439264E5-E266-4120-A735-0517D7CDB4DA@mac.com \
--to=tuhs@tuhs.org \
--cc=norwayjose@mac.com \
--cc=stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).