From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krewat@kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:20:06 -0400 Subject: [TUHS] System Economics (was is Linux "officially branded UNIX") In-Reply-To: <20170314155718.GH32139@yeono.kjorling.se> References: <20170314153815.GA32726@mcvoy.com> <9deec795-ecd6-7924-c10f-b722ee388a0c@kilonet.net> <20170314155718.GH32139@yeono.kjorling.se> Message-ID: <47c38ea0-accb-407b-26c8-6b4877657b21@kilonet.net> Everything. I'm trying to grok how long Linux as a whole was in active development. That includes all the GNU utilities, GCC, everything. Just like a "regular" corporate development environment would have devoted to the cause :) On 3/14/2017 11:57 AM, Michael Kjörling wrote: > On 14 Mar 2017 11:51 -0400, from krewat at kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat): >> in reality, how much of Linux was based on previous works? > Linux the kernel, or Linux the usable operating system (which would > include at least the essential userspace parts)? >