From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: brantley@coraid.com (Brantley Coile)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 21:47:39 -0400
Subject: [Unix-jun72] I recovered 100% of the s1 src code fragments
In-Reply-To: <20080511122858.GA13515@minnie.tuhs.org>
References: <1160605.1210386850465.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
	<20080511122858.GA13515@minnie.tuhs.org>
Message-ID: <4827A1BB.5020401@coraid.com>

Great.  I'll try to add the browse command to the assembly version.
With the 'b' command, you'll never miss vi.  Much.

  Brantley Coile

Warren Toomey wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:34:10PM -0400, Doug Merritt wrote:
> 
>>FYI I recovered 100% of the s1 src code fragments; I presume this
>>is of interest to y'all on this list, yes?
>>
>>Note that ed1.s and ed2.s are missing. Their source code simply wasn't
>>in any of the fragments (which means, was not on the s1 disk image).
> 
> 
> I just looked at 5th Edition:
> 
> -rw-r--r--  0 3      1        7998 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed1.s
> -rw-r--r--  0 3      1        5757 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed2.s
> -rw-r--r--  0 3      1        4616 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed3.s
> 
> which means that we do have "ed" in assembly format, and given that Doug
> found "ed3.s", we have a basis for comparison, which means we might be
> able to revert 5e ed1.s and ed2.s back to what runs on the 1st Edition kernel.
> 
> 	Warren
> _______________________________________________
> Unix-jun72 mailing list
> Unix-jun72 at tuhs.org
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/unix-jun72