From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d4e93e28 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 2580D9B626; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:06:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788269B5D7; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:06:41 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=loomcom.com header.i=@loomcom.com header.b="D3ad6DMb"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="csdFDOxp"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 30A549B5D7; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:06:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DEAD9B5BF for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:06:38 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97494DC for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:06:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:06:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loomcom.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=O0AGTu8eJBWDAyLpUFGRFynd3QM56Or xIYZPJBpRoFM=; b=D3ad6DMbgBn1p/FHXHD90TU7bN8MtU+KcPnKzvZhXMk5D9s uuCZOI+MkSK/LvjvuikeB4rBMzwJxxFEB6e4XaZnxIbE5ywEemuoglUrL5IIg/NE ft+Nha8aVfoy7El0vCMqzM7Qup4mTm6j0RNQ9x2YLLtlqdWu0SU4RgDmrPPQFFKo mTermVKkBfdObd3gK96Y8Ivlsahqc9WNqA6ofT8divw5Q9GQOHMcGFOhqX3X+Xia 3WNsErD3R/1skUCEea3pucbe5OIm6C5ADvhBbCUb+whW7vgJDJ2841+IAwCrnbVN t5MW4QGqJS73yUJ/anaerLmKm6bqIO3tze7FoQg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=O0AGTu 8eJBWDAyLpUFGRFynd3QM56OrxIYZPJBpRoFM=; b=csdFDOxpRKLkDvW5pLnOnv Ad3M3Je90e2jeh5A57BSQZHq/P15/oVXDQqgG9wlp48HRFmlgvg3fum99aThulGs L2yUZn6dSmN1K8VwFMpFL2zdnwwLiQNzOpgoaZpw3l8VQSu3OxPcgAKFAl4U0Ch5 niboLLfRuacy+dAFNas+aPKnFJI0nfYle9XUMfcDQISYNzM2xbyRP6L12NZ60BbP BJkYLISU5A7lVrWpVcCsFjNSpV014Sk5k+Sei7KFfK7dSV8x3vfXRC8He5fEem6y yi8VSzGGOiIN23hVowRxIS+eGEtpLU2nN7OPFf+Qd6im8O4MHw8WleyjVi5iST5w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrleelgddugeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfufgvthhhucfoohhrrggsihhtohdfuceofigvsgeslhho ohhmtghomhdrtghomheqnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeifvggssehlohhomh gtohhmrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id C2837C200A5; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:06:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-470-gedfae93-fmstable-20191021v4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <4a3383f9-473b-430c-8b91-6324a2793437@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20191028201408.GA37167@fuz.su> References: <20191028201408.GA37167@fuz.su> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:06:12 -0700 From: "Seth Morabito" To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] Design of the AT&T assembly syntax X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Mon, Oct 28, 2019, at 1:14 PM, Robert Clausecker wrote: > Some time ago, I wrote a piece [1] about the design of the AT&T > assembler syntax. Thanks for pointing this out, I think it's a really interesting read. I'm a bit of an oddball among my friends, because I actually like and prefer AT&T syntax. I think most of the other developers I know find my attitude to be abhorrent :) -Seth -- Seth Morabito Poulsbo, WA web@loomcom.com