From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7e1ee36a for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C33449B95A; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:10:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848AE9B92E; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:10:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E1B4A9B92E; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:10:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from firemail.de (firemail.de [88.99.137.45]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A6C9B92A for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:09:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from firemail.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by firemail.de (b1gMailServer) with ESMTP id 7EDA91A4 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:09:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:09:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4d252035b323b7583c5760c952d1982c@firemail.de> X-Mailer: b1gMail/7.4.0 X-Sender-IP: 93.209.197.134 From: "Thomas Paulsen" To: "Doug McIlroy" In-Reply-To: <202002171520.01HFKqKi026749@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> References: <202002171520.01HFKqKi026749@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: [TUHS] man Macro Package and pdfmark X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Thomas Paulsen Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" >*all* the stuff? Please don't do that literally. The garrulity >quotient of info pages dwarfs even that of the most excessive ;-) >modern man pages. But I appplaud the intent to assure man >pages are complete. info pages clearly are redundant. Even worser under linux most of them visu= alizing man pages, whereas hardly any man page is missing. They are emacs style help pages in the tradition of twenex/its, and I tell = you that a few years ago one guy (not me) recommended in the emacs develope= r list to replace tekinfo by something modern like .html. Thus the question isn't man or tekinfo for linux documentation but html/mar= kup or or tekinfo for emacs build-in self documentation.