The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Arnold <davida@pobox.com>
To: Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org>
Cc: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 23:56:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52098DD5-4FE0-4892-9288-12FE70793484@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E156D9B-C841-4693-BEA4-34C4BF42BCD5@iitbombay.org>


> On 25 May 2024, at 10:18, Bakul Shah via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> What would be nice if programming languages provided some support for such exhaustive testing[1].
> 
> At one point I had suggested turning Go's Interface type to something like Guttag style abstract data types in that relevant axioms are specified right in the interface definition. The idea was that any concrete type that implements that interface must satisfy its axioms. Even if the compiler ignored these axioms, one can write a support program that can generate a set of comprehensive tests based on these axioms.

Sounds like Eiffel, whose compiler had support for checking pre and post conditions (and maybe invariants?) at runtime, or disabling the checks for “performance” mode. 



d

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-25 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 13:49 Douglas McIlroy
2024-05-23 20:52 ` Rob Pike
2024-05-24  5:41   ` andrew
2024-05-24  7:17   ` Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-24  7:41     ` Rob Pike
2024-05-24 10:00       ` [TUHS] Is fuzz testing random? (Was: A fuzzy awk) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-24 11:56     ` [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk Dan Halbert
2024-05-25  0:17   ` Bakul Shah via TUHS
2024-05-25  0:57     ` G. Branden Robinson
2024-05-25 13:56     ` David Arnold [this message]
2024-05-25 17:18     ` Paul Winalski
2024-05-25 17:36       ` Tom Perrine
2024-05-25 17:53         ` [TUHS] Prof Don Good [was " Charles H Sauer (he/him)
2024-05-27  9:39 ` [TUHS] Testing an RE recogniser exhaustively. (Was: A fuzzy awk) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-27 13:03   ` [TUHS] " Hellwig Geisse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-20 14:09 [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk Serissa
2024-05-21  1:56 ` Rob Pike
2024-05-21  2:47   ` Larry McVoy
2024-05-21  2:54     ` Lawrence Stewart
2024-05-21  3:36       ` Rob Pike
2024-05-21 11:59         ` Peter Weinberger (温博格) via TUHS
2024-05-21  3:53   ` George Michaelson
2024-05-21 16:59   ` Paul Winalski
2024-05-21 17:56     ` segaloco via TUHS
2024-05-21 18:12     ` Luther Johnson
2024-05-22 15:37       ` Paul Winalski
2024-05-22 18:49         ` Larry McVoy
2024-05-22 20:17           ` Larry McVoy
2024-05-22  3:26     ` Dave Horsfall
2024-05-22  5:08       ` Alexis
2024-05-22 13:12         ` Warner Losh
2024-05-20 13:06 [TUHS] A fuzzy awk. (Was: The 'usage: ...' message.) Douglas McIlroy
2024-05-20 13:25 ` [TUHS] " Chet Ramey
2024-05-20 13:41   ` [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-20 14:26     ` Chet Ramey
2024-05-22 13:44     ` arnold
2024-05-20 13:54 ` Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-19 23:08 [TUHS] The 'usage: ...' message. (Was: On Bloat...) Douglas McIlroy
2024-05-20  0:58 ` [TUHS] " Rob Pike
2024-05-20  3:19   ` arnold
2024-05-20  9:20     ` [TUHS] A fuzzy awk. (Was: The 'usage: ...' message.) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-20 13:10       ` [TUHS] " Chet Ramey
2024-05-20 13:30         ` [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-20 13:48           ` Chet Ramey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52098DD5-4FE0-4892-9288-12FE70793484@pobox.com \
    --to=davida@pobox.com \
    --cc=bakul@iitbombay.org \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).