From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3aba64c7 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8C9E79B651; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:39:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C269A93D48; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:39:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="EFFYDS4G"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9338993D1B; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:39:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com (mail-qt1-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F4893D1B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:39:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id u22so17497924qtq.13 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:39:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wjeIXD5IrEF726lCEy0ZExoLAzeKnNWvC2uOFN9GD90=; b=EFFYDS4GgKIcoCsEehGl0l3C02B5gpRkH8k3At32Cxtbol7DnLg1X0rWRe0OYWYYnA Y+lj7mlPCyJYSXx4V4RcmljkHwrkEKgWy7HWFroEdTEfSO/8O80gl1aUU2vSn0OgBigd hTklqXWQfKOzWM76X1FcwmPVSk0Tqf939MZiFO93hpNmade+PnkPcjj0Fbr4uZquX43/ gZY2PnwXoqVWHquC3pRjCkYIE2+zwvOw2mlushCXLmvJUcryEFdmVRoXcToXfMadeg5N HH7DRzbdnYip50O2yR35UzCdlcskzewO3mZAscEfS24d/c6ah58wTPVp9VGlYz3YWhIt aOYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wjeIXD5IrEF726lCEy0ZExoLAzeKnNWvC2uOFN9GD90=; b=IW/M+FjdN0rgWl9bxApMiY6bfu0SaWNcXU56mEbejI2m/8tViC9CHnzHUpI+yqX1dZ 9bUzQ7Z+rxMmRZgGw1NRyvEyGTTyHvFz2Fr7xuatGiYh9z5H/cx55j92fWAyGgB8EC/1 BcSRn9l9PqyPMSMtpNVfV0XuRoiaet5UOp4bQO+8F3r689zoVmJPjaQw36szoocZPgJV vhYZ2UX2LqNOrHlTh1h4I83SnLTBPym9bHj2KC8nYpyAtCMvLoenTnRXhl1K5OTYucWF CyqPEq90eKxG3KCyQhZO/UVSFuL6N4ED+GXPMIAyPHCjGAieuN6xJ2r6uhv46emA6GAN /eSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVh6qGT80eAEBPAGIRp1HB5u0c637sQnzINu1o6KxLM+3f7tFy+ aCLvGOi4+/yKZdEOxP4f2izGn7B6W84= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxzLw2iHV8T/UK0Iowm0UwvN0xkZ7bcudBw7xNuKanajXT7zXepYlkpF+7AxXVguTcLhW4fog== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:750d:: with SMTP id u13mr1469007qtq.283.1572309549170; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.24] (198.27.14-65.ip.mltn.standardbroadband.ca. [198.27.14.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s123sm2862506qke.31.2019.10.28.17.39.08 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:39:08 -0700 (PDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <20191028201408.GA37167@fuz.su> <4a3383f9-473b-430c-8b91-6324a2793437@www.fastmail.com> From: Nemo Nusquam Message-ID: <5623d077-218b-4b15-ae62-8b84ab4bbfae@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:31:16 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS sun4u; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4a3383f9-473b-430c-8b91-6324a2793437@www.fastmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [TUHS] Design of the AT&T assembly syntax X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 10/28/19 17:06, Seth Morabito wrote: >> >> Thanks for pointing this out, I think it's a really interesting read. >> >> [...] because I actually like and prefer AT&T syntax. +1 > I think most of the other developers I know find my attitude to be abhorrent :) > > -Seth