The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.senn@gmail.com (Will Senn)
Subject: [TUHS] why is sum reporting different checksum's between v6 and v7
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:03:51 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <566B6467.5060703@gmail.com> (raw)

All,

While working on the latest episode of my saga about moving files 
between v6 and v7, I noticed that the sum utility from v6 reports a 
different checksum than it does using the sum utility from v7 for the 
same file. To confirm, I did the following on both systems:

# echo "Hello, World" > hi.txt
# cat hi.txt
Hello, World

Then on v6:
# sum hi.txt
1106 1

But on v7:
# sum hi.txt
37264     1

There is no man page for the utility on v6, and it's assembler. On v7, 
there's a manpage and it's C:
man sum
...
Sum calculates and prints a 16-bit checksum for the named
      file, and also prints the number of blocks in the file.
...

A few questions:
1. I'll eventually be able to read assembly and learn what the v6 
utility is doing the hard way, but does anyone know what's going on here?
2. Why is sum reporting different checksum's between v6 and v7?
3. Do you know of an alternative to check that the bytes were 
transferred exactly? I used od and then compared the text representation 
of the bytes  on the host using diff (other than differences in output 
between v6 and v7 related to duplicate lines, it worked ok but is clunky).

Thanks,

Will



             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-12  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-12  0:03 Will Senn [this message]
2015-12-12  0:10 ` Clem cole
2015-12-12  0:38 ` Random832
2015-12-12  0:30 Noel Chiappa
2015-12-12  1:07 ` Random832
2015-12-12  1:22 Noel Chiappa
2015-12-12  1:46 ` Random832
2015-12-12  1:50 ` John Cowan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=566B6467.5060703@gmail.com \
    --to=will.senn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).