* [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition
@ 2013-02-01 1:55 Benjamin Huntsman
2013-02-01 12:20 ` Angelo Papenhoff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Huntsman @ 2013-02-01 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
While the subject of historical stuff has been brought up, anyone thought about going another round with Attachmate to see if they'd extend the Ancient UNIX License to include v10, v9, and v8? Attachmate is the current owner these days, aren't they?
I'm sure they, Novell, AT&T, and Lucent all don't care. But someone's still got to sign the line. I'm really hoping to see v10x86, like v7x86 someday!!
I've got a copy of v8 I'd love to make available some day, and I know there are at least one or two copies of v10 still in existence. last I heard, there was no v9.
Anyone here know anybody at Attachmate?
Many thanks!
-Ben
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition
2013-02-01 1:55 [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition Benjamin Huntsman
@ 2013-02-01 12:20 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2013-02-02 6:58 ` Wesley Parish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Angelo Papenhoff @ 2013-02-01 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 01:55:43 +0000, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
> While the subject of historical stuff has been brought up, anyone
> thought about going another round with Attachmate to see if they'd
> extend the Ancient UNIX License to include v10, v9, and v8?
> Attachmate is the current owner these days, aren't they?
> I'm sure they, Novell, AT&T, and Lucent all don't care. But
> someone's still got to sign the line. I'm really hoping to see
> v10x86, like v7x86 someday!!
>
> I've got a copy of v8 I'd love to make available some day, and I know
> there are at least one or two copies of v10 still in existence. last
> I heard, there was no v9.
>
> Anyone here know anybody at Attachmate?
>
> Many thanks!
>
> -Ben
Great to hear there still exist copies of later research Unices.
We should definitely ask for an extension of the Ancient UNIX License
(possibly to include SysIII or even SysV as well?).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition
2013-02-01 12:20 ` Angelo Papenhoff
@ 2013-02-02 6:58 ` Wesley Parish
2013-02-02 7:38 ` Ronald Natalie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wesley Parish @ 2013-02-02 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
That would make sense. SysV is about twenty years old, and its status
as an ultra-holy reliquary of trade secrets and whatnot has been
severely dented by Sun's open-sourcing of Solaris.
If anyone knows who to contact at Attachmate, I'd say, go for the
full bag, of Research Unix and commercial Unix.
Wesley Parish
On 2/02/2013, at 1:20 AM, Angelo Papenhoff wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 01:55:43 +0000, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
>> While the subject of historical stuff has been brought up, anyone
>> thought about going another round with Attachmate to see if they'd
>> extend the Ancient UNIX License to include v10, v9, and v8?
>> Attachmate is the current owner these days, aren't they?
>> I'm sure they, Novell, AT&T, and Lucent all don't care. But
>> someone's still got to sign the line. I'm really hoping to see
>> v10x86, like v7x86 someday!!
>>
>> I've got a copy of v8 I'd love to make available some day, and I know
>> there are at least one or two copies of v10 still in existence. last
>> I heard, there was no v9.
>>
>> Anyone here know anybody at Attachmate?
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>> -Ben
>
> Great to hear there still exist copies of later research Unices.
> We should definitely ask for an extension of the Ancient UNIX License
> (possibly to include SysIII or even SysV as well?).
>
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition
2013-02-02 6:58 ` Wesley Parish
@ 2013-02-02 7:38 ` Ronald Natalie
2013-02-03 15:34 ` Rox 64
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ronald Natalie @ 2013-02-02 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Feb 2, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Wesley Parish <wes.parish at paradise.net.nz> wrote:
> That would make sense. SysV is about twenty years old, and its status as an ultra-holy reliquary of trade secrets and whatnot has been severely dented by Sun's open-sourcing of Solaris.
Twenty years is pretty much when USL got out of the UNIX biz entirely. System V actually started thirty years ago or so. I worked on System V over BSD project with Doug Gwyn when still at BRL and I left there in 1987. Amusingly, I continued to find copies of the "Ron" shell kicking around for decades after that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-03 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-01 1:55 [TUHS] 10th Edition, 8th Edition Benjamin Huntsman
2013-02-01 12:20 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2013-02-02 6:58 ` Wesley Parish
2013-02-02 7:38 ` Ronald Natalie
2013-02-03 15:34 ` Rox 64
2013-02-03 16:37 ` Larry McVoy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).