The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ronald Natalie <ron@ronnatalie.com>
To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] Supercomputer UNIX (was Aga moments).
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:27:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5BEB9BF4-9357-4F59-8F0C-8D417130549E@ronnatalie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn1qGBc2qJh0Uiq=zt+dGZOtQxEkLtOW8i+wF2dzZ933mA@mail.gmail.com>

I’ll omit comments on Data Generals, DEC-10/20, and other non-UNIX stuff.

We had a series of three supercomputers at the BRL.    The first was the Denelcor HEP which was pretty much purpose built for us.   Originally slated to be an Analog, then Hybrid, it ended up as a MIMD ECL-logic digital machine.   Denelcor was stalled on what OS to use and was writing their own proprietary one when we stepped in and told them we would put UNIX on the thing.     The thing was slated to share the main computer center room with the last Cyber 7600 ever build.    We had taped out the location of all the cabinets on the floor around this building pillar.     Shortly after I started at the labs, I flew out to Denelcor and noted that the machine was sitting on their floor in our configuration except they had tape where our building pillar was.    It was kind of a fun research exercise.   The thing had 4 PEMs which each could run 8 independent (what we would call in UNIX) processes.    The hardware could also schedule for each of these up to 256 (what we would call in UNIX) threads.   All the memory had two semaphores on each word (full/empty bits) and the various load/store operations could be told to “wait for full” or “wait for empty.”

The I/O on the thing was a box that had 32 individual UNIBUSs on it.   It’s memory showed up on the common memory bus (really a big network) without the semaphore bits.   I wrote all the UNIX IO code to drive this stuff and found out that it was taking forever to start I/Os.    This was because they had put the control logic on this secondary bus called (aptly) “The Low Speed Bus.”    The LSB’s primary function was to get the machine booted up (which involved programming the network swtich for the regular memory channel).   Confronted with the problem at the local Golden Corral one night, Burton Smith the original designer and I designed a new control system to use a spare PDP-11/34 I had that would connect things up direct to the highspeed memory.   It ran the same pidjin OS that our internet routers ran (LOS…no time for sharing, uniprocessor system).

Tthe thing excelled at highly parallelizable stuff like Mike’s raytrace code and really all it ever got used for is to make a movie “A Shell’s-eye view of a tank.”

It got shutdown and promplty replaced with the Army’s first “real” supercomputer, a Cray X/MP.    This particular machine was slated for delivery to Apple, but the Army used “emergency” authority to get Cray to give it to us.    We pretty much insisted on runing UNICOS (Cray’s UNIX) rather than Cray’s prorpietary OS.     As I recall, the X/MP didn’t really require anything special as far as facility goes.    There’s a picture in my files somewhere of me standing in the middle of the thing peering out.

One of my last jobs at BRL was to be on the selection board for the Cray 2 there.    That as the previous poster states, required a lot of specialized facility work.   It wasn’t installed before I left, but it was my signature that was on the $25 Million dollar procurement paperwork for that thing.

Amusingly, Mike wanted to call the two machines Patton and Rommel (hey, it’s the army).   We named the XMP Patton, but then one of our interns whose last name was Patton managed to wreck his car and kill himself so the powers that be decided that the Patton name would officially dedicated to him and nixed the idea of Rommel.   The Cray 2 was named after long term director of the laboratory, Robert J. Eichelberger (father of modern shaped charges).   The problem is that Eichelberger wasn’t a workable name on the network, and RJE had bad connotations with regard to old mainframe submittals.    The machine was officially known as “Bob.”



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-15  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10 20:55 [TUHS] What was your "Aha, Unix!" moment? Warren Toomey
2019-10-10 21:11 ` SPC
2019-10-10 21:25   ` Jim Capp
2019-10-10 21:33     ` greg travis
2019-10-10 21:13 ` Michael Parson
2019-10-10 21:15 ` Matt Rudge
2019-10-10 21:31 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2019-10-10 21:34 ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-10 23:10 ` Seth J. Morabito
2019-10-10 23:23 ` Brian L. Stuart
2019-10-10 23:28   ` George Michaelson
2019-10-10 23:35 ` Bakul Shah
2019-10-10 23:49   ` David
2019-10-11  1:44 ` Gregg Levine
2019-10-11  1:45   ` Gregg Levine
2019-10-11 10:55 ` Leah Neukirchen
2019-10-11 12:04   ` Tyler Adams
2019-10-13 19:46     ` Peter Jeremy
2019-10-14  2:13       ` Lawrence Stewart
2019-10-14  2:32         ` Rico Pajarola
2019-10-14  9:49           ` Michael Kjörling
2019-10-14 18:36             ` Nemo Nusquam
2019-10-14 21:10               ` Jim Geist
2019-10-14 22:22                 ` Warren Toomey
2019-10-14 22:56                 ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-14 23:44                   ` Jim Geist
2019-10-14 23:47                     ` Adam Thornton
2019-10-14 23:54                       ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-15  0:03                         ` Henry Bent
2019-10-14 23:54                       ` Ronald Natalie
2019-10-15  0:04                         ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-15  0:06                           ` Ronald Natalie
2019-10-15  0:27                             ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-15  0:07                         ` George Michaelson
2019-10-15  0:10                           ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-15  0:27                           ` Ronald Natalie [this message]
2019-10-15  0:33                             ` [TUHS] Supercomputer UNIX (was Aha moments) Ronald Natalie
2019-10-14 23:52                     ` [TUHS] What was your "Aha, Unix!" moment? Arthur Krewat
2019-10-11 12:53 ` KatolaZ
2019-10-11 16:44 ` Pete Wright
2019-10-11 17:13 ` Jim Geist
2019-10-11 17:20   ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-11 17:40   ` Jim Capp
2019-10-11 17:48 ` Larry W. Cashdollar via TUHS
2019-10-11 21:56 ` Tomasz Rola
2019-10-12  2:41 ` ricercar
2019-10-12  3:01   ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-12 14:37     ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-10-12 16:12     ` David
2019-10-12 17:59       ` Adam Thornton
2019-10-12 19:10         ` Jon Forrest
2019-10-13 21:45           ` Steve Johnson
2019-10-14  0:36             ` Jon Forrest
2019-10-14  2:08               ` Lawrence Stewart
2019-10-16 13:29             ` Pierre DAVID
2019-10-12  3:23   ` Richard Salz
2019-10-12  3:34     ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-12 21:32     ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2019-10-12  8:55 ` Wesley Parish
2019-10-12 10:17 ` Naveen Nathan
2019-10-12 11:54 ` markus schnalke
2019-10-12 19:33 ` Michael Kjörling
2019-10-12 22:38   ` Gregg Levine
2019-10-13  1:37 ` Dan Cross
2019-10-13 15:00 ` Robert Brockway
2019-10-13 15:33 ` arnold
2019-10-13 15:41   ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-13 15:47     ` David Potesta
2019-10-18  1:49 ` Dave Horsfall
2019-10-18 12:07   ` Ronald Natalie
2019-10-21 16:16 ` Dario Niedermann
2019-10-23  5:13 ` Gilles Gravier
2019-10-23  6:19   ` Adam Thornton
2019-10-23 15:08   ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-23 15:11     ` Larry McVoy
2019-10-23 15:26       ` Arrigo Triulzi
2019-10-23 15:33         ` Dan Cross
2019-10-23 16:19           ` Arthur Krewat
2019-10-23 15:17     ` Richard Salz
2019-10-23 15:22       ` Arrigo Triulzi
2019-10-23 16:45     ` Will Senn
2019-10-23 22:19       ` Adam Thornton
2019-10-24 17:32       ` Tom Ivar Helbekkmo via TUHS
2019-10-26  0:33     ` Dave Horsfall
2019-10-25 20:58 ` John S Quarterman
2019-10-25 22:11   ` Will Senn
2019-10-26  0:57 ` William Corcoran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5BEB9BF4-9357-4F59-8F0C-8D417130549E@ronnatalie.com \
    --to=ron@ronnatalie.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).