From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: Douglas McIlroy <douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu>
Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] RFS
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:08:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5be7bd0177c9c57e@orthanc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKH6PiVDCdD8JLAvgA9Bbb8nHrUz=9JQY0U-LpeiPq9LTFAOYA@mail.gmail.com>
Douglas McIlroy writes:
> I was always sorry that Peter Weinberger's RFS never made it outside
> Bell Labs. It allowed networking between separately administered
> systems by mapping UIDs.
My experience with (SVR3) RFS can be summed up in two words:
stateful, and brittle
We ran RFS on a "cluster" of four 3B2s, and while it worked, to
varying degrees, the statefulness of the protocol inevitably led
to the whole thing locking up, requiring a reboot of all four
machines to recover. This was especially problematic when we
accessed the one 9-track drive over RFS when attempting backups.
I eventually gave up on it, and hauled out the Lachman NFS source
tape and got NFS running on all the machines. Life was much happier
afterwards.
I do not miss RFS.
--lyndon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-13 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 0:59 [TUHS] NFS 40th anniversary event Tom Lyon
2025-08-13 1:55 ` [TUHS] " Larry McVoy
2025-08-13 3:05 ` Dave Horsfall
2025-08-13 5:59 ` [TUHS] Greetings! Phillip Harbison
2025-08-13 14:00 ` [TUHS] Re: NFS 40th anniversary event Douglas McIlroy
2025-08-13 14:18 ` Dan Cross
2025-08-13 14:59 ` arnold
2025-08-13 15:26 ` Douglas McIlroy
2025-08-13 15:34 ` arnold
2025-08-13 15:47 ` Martin Schröder
2025-08-14 3:43 ` arnold
2025-08-13 15:56 ` Larry McVoy
2025-08-13 16:24 ` Peter Weinberger (温博格) via TUHS
2025-08-13 16:43 ` Tom Lyon
2025-08-13 17:27 ` Larry McVoy
2025-08-13 20:24 ` Will Senn
2025-08-14 1:41 ` Bakul Shah via TUHS
2025-08-14 2:04 ` Tom Lyon
2025-08-14 0:31 ` Jonathan Gray
2025-08-14 0:54 ` Charles H. Sauer (he/him)
2025-08-14 1:28 ` Rich Salz
2025-08-14 1:29 ` Tom Lyon
2025-08-13 17:08 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-13 20:40 [TUHS] RFS Steve Simon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5be7bd0177c9c57e@orthanc.ca \
--to=lyndon@orthanc.ca \
--cc=douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).