Thanks, Henry, you found my mistake.

I've corrected the links to the Sept 1983 maps and verified that the 
date in the map is September.  Would you please rerun that one? :)

The extra icons in the legend are nice!

Yes, I agree doing this on a plotter would be better. I recall Brian 
Reid doing just that as a product demo of an HP plotter at one Usenix. I 
had such a poster, I was going to bring it this week but I can't find 
it. Now I know where he got his data...

Thanks,

     Mary Ann

On 7/9/19 3:02 PM, Henry Bent wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 17:46, Henry Bent <henry.r.bent@gmail.com 
> <mailto:henry.r.bent@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 17:39, Grant Taylor via TUHS
>     <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>> wrote:
>
>         On 7/9/19 2:54 PM, Mary Ann Horton Gmail wrote:
>         > Any chance you could do the same for this file? It looks
>         smaller, but
>         > it's a couple weeks newer so it's possible it's somehow better.
>
>         While searching for the 2nd article for the May, I found the
>         following
>         articles:
>
>         Link - Usenet graphic map of North America, part 1 of 2
>           -
>         https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=net.sources/ZoPcfdMPIzQ/pEPpCV6m77QJ
>
>         Link - Usenet graphic map of North America, part 2 of 2
>           -
>         https://groups.google.com/forum/message/raw?msg=net.sources/cE_tkMNKZ_U/JoR7KGTJ_3YJ
>
>         The dates of these articles are September 21, 1983.
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Grant. . . .
>         unix || die
>
>
>     Thanks Grant, Mary Ann found what I needed and I'm working away. 
>     Somehow in going back over what I used to build a working setup I
>     managed to break my working setup, so I'm trying to fix that to
>     get the next set of files output.
>
>     -Henry
>
>
> OK, here's the second set of Usenet maps, again in raw plot and SVG 
> form.  The only difference with the "g" maps, produced with the 
> gmap.leroy script, seems to be the addition of a few graphical icons.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y6PU1NJv8mdVr1SQsQUDnUjNlq6N2bvv/view?usp=sharing
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JpbMTzhmJD-amLCpYOWMPQCHyCsrC_ck/view?usp=sharing
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WRhiPTj1URUGNuxCh-8ERuK0FnQ_i1tk/view?usp=sharing
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1plhCfaP1Uyxu5wAgtQEyPEA88r8JLHIW/view?usp=sharing
>
> I'm pretty sure this is how they would have looked originally, 
> cluttered as they are.  The nice thing about them being in a vector 
> format, though, is that you could blow them up to poster size if you 
> wanted to.
>
> -Henry