From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: krewat@kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:00:33 -0400 Subject: [TUHS] BSD 4.2 distribution differences In-Reply-To: <4004e165-88da-5ec4-7502-f18a381a9fac@kilonet.net> References: <4004e165-88da-5ec4-7502-f18a381a9fac@kilonet.net> Message-ID: <5cbaca48-e04f-5640-50be-b654f5bb0fef@kilonet.net> Question: In BSD-land, how do you "version" something like this? Two different "snapshots" of BSD 4.2 - what file/version #/whatever is used to definitely put a "version number" on this? FYI, the distribution I have, vfont.tar is truncated, it was the last file on the first tape, and at the time may have had a read error. 4,372,480 bytes of it were read, while the TUHS version is 5,888,000 However, the part that I have which is about 80% of the tar matches the first 74% of the TUHS 4.2BSD distribution after extracting the files, even though the checksum of that first 74% doesn't match. So when I cobble this together, I'll just use the TUHS 4.2BSD vfont.tar and make a note of it in the index. On 4/12/2017 3:10 PM, Arthur Krewat wrote: > > > On 4/12/2017 2:37 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: >> >> From the quick look of the copies I have including from the CSRG >> archives I purchased, I assume the TUHS version is the same as the CSRG >> archives. >> >> Will you make your copy of the files available? >> > > Absolutely! As soon as I determine without a doubt that it contains > nothing proprietary. > > >