From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net (Grant Taylor) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 13:44:51 -0600 Subject: [TUHS] UNIX of choice these days? In-Reply-To: <20170926174342.GA28606@mcvoy.com> References: <20170924140617.GG28606@mcvoy.com> <20170924203621.GA80203@wopr> <49B7FCB8-A086-4FFB-AF3B-4B3BD167EC54@bitblocks.com> <1506297783.59c847b740373@www.paradise.net.nz> <1506386563.59c9a2834015a@www.paradise.net.nz> <20170926144155.GW28606@mcvoy.com> <46A45CD5-45A0-44C8-ABC4-0644D7A23493@bitblocks.com> <20170926174342.GA28606@mcvoy.com> Message-ID: <5dac0da9-1c7b-a672-6236-abf27b67b01f@tnetconsulting.net> On 09/26/2017 11:43 AM, Larry McVoy wrote: > Yeah, the old school people want their comfort zone, I'm also not so sure > that FCoE is such a good idea. I think the main driver for FCoE is the fact that data centers don't want two parallel networks, Ethernet and Fibre Channel. I don't think either side of the house /likes/ FCoE, but both are willing to (begrudgingly) work with it. -- Grant. . . . unix || die -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 3717 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: