The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Charles H Sauer (he/him)" <sauer@technologists.com>
To: Dan Stromberg <drsalists@gmail.com>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] First Unix-like OSes not derived from AT&T code?
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 15:37:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66d4f8a7-d803-913d-f969-25b29652b23d@technologists.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGGBd_rm2oNpY-qzr1cfk=vswA6ivixAr9mWF4e2-fwbt4px0w@mail.gmail.com>

Except to the extent discussed in my cited post, that seems overstated 
to me, untrue through AIX 3 on 6K and RT hardware, unlikely to be true 
post AIX 3.

On 5/1/2022 2:49 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> 
> I don't know where the fellow got his information, but I was told that 
> AIX started out as AT&T code, but went through not one but two rewrites.
> 
> On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 11:55 AM Charles H Sauer (he/him) 
> <sauer@technologists.com <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I don't recall that particular case, but AIX was definitely derived
>     from
>     AT&T code. See
>     https://notes.technologists.com/notes/2017/03/08/lets-start-at-the-very-beginning-801-romp-rtpc-aix-versions/
>     <https://notes.technologists.com/notes/2017/03/08/lets-start-at-the-very-beginning-801-romp-rtpc-aix-versions/>
> 
>     HOWEVER, when the 1983 transition happened and AIX became a primary
>     site
>     effort (as discussed in the cited reference), there were those new to
>     the effort and new to Unix that thought they could redefine behaviors
>     inappropriately.
> 
>     For example, I recall one person trying to enforce only one root login
>     at a time. Larry made it quite clear to that person that we were not
>     going to violate Unix tradition in that manner.
> 
>     Charlie
> 
>     On 5/1/2022 1:08 PM, ron minnich wrote:
>      > in terms of rewrites from manuals, while it was not the first, as I
>      > understand it, AIX was an example of "read the manual, write the
>      > code."
>      >
>      > Unlike Coherent, it had lots of cases of things not done quite right.
>      > One standout in my mind was mkdir -p, which would return an error if
>      > the full path existed. oops.
>      >
>      > But it was pointed out to me that Condor had all kinds of code to
>      > handle AIX being different from just about everything else.
>      >
>      >
>      > On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 7:12 AM Kenneth Goodwin
>      > <kennethgoodwin56@gmail.com <mailto:kennethgoodwin56@gmail.com>>
>     wrote:
>      >>
>      >> I actually purchased several copies of Coherent when it was
>     first released and used it as printer servers for a bunch of
>     inexpensive Centronics based printers. lpd based server to server
>     transfers. Took the printing burden off the main systems. Someone
>     came out with a network based print spooler box (Milan ??) later on
>     which I switched over to after MW passed into obscurity.
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> On Sun, May 1, 2022, 7:46 AM Ron Natalie <ron@ronnatalie.com
>     <mailto:ron@ronnatalie.com>> wrote:
>      >>>
>      >>> Mark Williams Coherent was one I worked with on the PC many
>     years ago.
>      >>>
>      >>>> On May 1, 2022, at 11:34, Andrew Warkentin
>     <andreww591@gmail.com <mailto:andreww591@gmail.com>> wrote:
>      >>>>
>      >>>> What was the first "clone" functional Unix (i.e. an OS not
>     derived
>      >>>> from genetic Unix code but highly compatible with genetic
>     Unix)? Idris
>      >>>> is the earliest such OS of which I am aware (at least AFAIK
>     it's not a
>      >>>> genetic Unix), but was it actually the first? Similarly, which
>     was the
>      >>>> first "outer Unix-like" system (i.e. one with strong Unix
>     influence
>      >>>> but significantly incompatible with functional Unix)? Off the
>     top of
>      >>>> my head the earliest such system I can think of is Thoth (which
>      >>>> predates Idris by almost 2 years), but again I'm not sure if
>     it was
>      >>>> actually the first.
>      >>>
> 
>     -- 
>     voice: +1.512.784.7526       e-mail: sauer@technologists.com
>     <mailto:sauer@technologists.com>
>     fax: +1.512.346.5240         Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
>     Facebook/Google/Twitter
>     <https://technologists.com/sauer/Facebook/Google/Twitter>: CharlesHSauer
> 

-- 
voice: +1.512.784.7526       e-mail: sauer@technologists.com
fax: +1.512.346.5240         Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
Facebook/Google/Twitter: CharlesHSauer

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-01 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-01  9:30 Andrew Warkentin
2022-05-01 11:43 ` Ron Natalie
2022-05-01 11:56   ` Rob Pike
2022-05-01 14:03     ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-05-03  4:37       ` Jim Carpenter
2022-05-01 14:09   ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-05-01 18:08     ` ron minnich
2022-05-01 18:22       ` Charles H Sauer (he/him)
2022-05-01 19:49         ` Dan Stromberg
2022-05-01 20:37           ` Charles H Sauer (he/him) [this message]
2022-05-02  2:08       ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-05-02  9:21         ` Dr Iain Maoileoin
2022-05-02 20:19           ` Rich Morin
2022-05-02 21:30             ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 21:36             ` Dan Cross
2022-05-10 15:28         ` Mary Ann Horton
2022-05-10 16:08           ` Warner Losh
2022-05-10 16:40             ` Heinz Lycklama
2022-05-10 16:42             ` James Frew
2022-05-14  2:56             ` Mary Ann Horton
2022-05-10 16:59           ` Clem Cole
2022-05-10 17:18             ` Clem Cole
2022-05-10 18:05               ` Charles H Sauer (he/him)
2022-05-10 19:27                 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2022-05-10 19:08               ` Henry Bent
2022-05-10 19:33                 ` Richard Salz
2022-05-10 20:18                   ` Ronald Natalie
2022-05-11 16:20                     ` James Frew
2022-05-11 16:51                       ` Paul Winalski
2022-05-10 20:28                   ` Henry Bent
2022-05-10 20:43                   ` Warner Losh
2022-05-10 20:46                   ` Clem Cole
2022-05-11 16:44                     ` Paul Winalski
2022-05-11 17:09                       ` Clem Cole
2022-05-11 17:35                       ` Larry McVoy
2022-05-12  0:16                         ` George Michaelson
2022-05-13  2:46                         ` Adam Thornton
2022-05-15  0:48                           ` Larry McVoy
2022-05-15  5:36                             ` Adam Thornton
2022-05-15 13:37                               ` Larry McVoy
2022-05-12  5:22                       ` Warner Losh
2022-05-12 12:06                         ` Ron Natalie
2022-05-12 12:43                           ` John Cowan
2022-05-15  2:00         ` Stuart Remphrey
2022-05-02  2:42       ` Phil Budne
2022-05-02  6:46         ` Ron Natalie
2022-05-02 13:50           ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 14:46             ` tytso
2022-05-02 15:38               ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 20:31                 ` Warner Losh
2022-05-03  5:01                   ` tytso
2022-05-03 11:35                     ` Richard Salz
2022-05-02 23:30           ` Gregg Levine
     [not found]           ` <CAK7dMtD08weh+97mx+ncrq0cxprKgke42C0vFYNPnBkd8Fx9Sg@mail.gmail.com>
2022-05-03  7:28             ` Ronald Natalie
2022-05-02 12:59         ` Kenneth Goodwin
2022-05-02 14:13           ` Richard Salz
2022-05-02 13:14         ` tytso
2022-05-02 13:32           ` Larry McVoy
2022-05-02 13:16         ` Dan Cross
2022-05-02 14:14           ` Miod Vallat
2022-05-02 14:50             ` ron minnich
2022-05-02 16:13             ` Al Kossow
2022-05-02 18:46               ` Miod Vallat
2022-05-02 19:54               ` Chet Ramey
2022-05-02 21:17             ` Dan Cross
2022-05-02 23:49               ` George Michaelson
2022-05-03  7:22                 ` Ronald Natalie
2022-05-03  7:40               ` Miod Vallat
2022-05-03  8:03                 ` Ron Natalie
     [not found]               ` <CAEoi9W4eD8AF=FwjMT-KPRfyYgD+qgVvE1u3sBwiovm4=1WWLg@mail.g mail.com>
2022-05-03 12:14                 ` John Foust via TUHS
2022-05-01 20:55 ` Michael Huff
2022-05-03  4:55   ` Jim Carpenter
2022-05-02 15:43 ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 16:16   ` Bakul Shah
2022-05-02 16:19     ` Bakul Shah
2022-05-02 17:14       ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 16:29     ` Larry McVoy
2022-05-02 17:42     ` Clem Cole
2022-05-02 17:59       ` Bakul Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66d4f8a7-d803-913d-f969-25b29652b23d@technologists.com \
    --to=sauer@technologists.com \
    --cc=drsalists@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).