From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ca4270ea for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 19:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BAE099B907; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:16:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA209B901; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:16:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CCB359B8FA; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:16:30 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 1524 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at minnie.tuhs.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:16:30 AEST Received: from smtp2.cs.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.cs.stanford.edu [171.64.64.26]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D96F9B8F9 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:16:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from solarpost.stanford.edu ([171.64.103.115]:60062) by smtp2.cs.Stanford.EDU with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1guM6E-0001MS-VS for tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:51:06 -0800 Received: from [107.135.30.30] (helo=MacBook-Air-2.local) by solarpost.Stanford.EDU with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1guM6D-0001W5-Rl for tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:51:06 -0800 To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: From: Deborah Scherrer Organization: Stanford University Message-ID: <68aa2bf7-a854-3c52-810d-ff1babb6e705@solar.stanford.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 10:51:08 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------958220AEE402100B77871508" X-Scan-Signature: 3e263c829a24e9e508d860775f9d44fb Subject: Re: [TUHS] Women in computing X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------958220AEE402100B77871508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In the early days of Usenix, I used to keep track of the women. Initially, about 30% of the organization was female. That dropped every year. I also used to count the number of women at the Usenix conferences. By the time of a large one, about 3,000 people in San Francisco, I counted 12 women... On 2/14/19 5:14 AM, John P. Linderman wrote: > https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/13/magazine/women-coding-computer-programming.html --------------958220AEE402100B77871508 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In the early days of Usenix, I used to keep track of the women.  Initially, about 30% of the organization was female.  That dropped every year.  I also used to count the number of women at the Usenix conferences.  By the time of a large one, about 3,000 people in San Francisco, I counted 12 women...

On 2/14/19 5:14 AM, John P. Linderman wrote:

--------------958220AEE402100B77871508--