From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4849 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2022 00:23:58 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 31 Jan 2022 00:23:58 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id F3C0F9D0C9; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:23:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE67951B7; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:23:31 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="D4Cc8k9O"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 10135951B7; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:23:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (mail-qk1-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9505D9518E for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:23:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id o25so10784977qkj.7 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:23:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Sro8BOMRlF0PSkVrdgqju+G77UOm7e4hlF4mi/A55Bk=; b=D4Cc8k9ORKq//VUlltZG3JzvjbDB68B1EuUlP46OlOQE3hSH6mFQLQDAwHj21zHSNV Hx+uPZ6pnBx99LA9fhIdQYBiLCrNwARP1pbIlmu8TISJ+uqE7+uYN4Sh6vAqxBoqTY/w EJQgRCxIrBk8LxIYgZeymaEd7YnBIO0xQ30LKfwdCwEXd3hhmMqN7F8PPd3IJ5fUJdUI 5UxVlRa4DOLZ8T+MhDWB06srWaAqwhWUG+Sel0qudsWhcurJxMIBUM9UvT89ymsAoVgs RccoBwH0qDtZ86MapCoP88SsjlgTouFRq9UfLnoI+z7Q/ydd14vjgrQ1mLNr0W/0rnFX Eofw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Sro8BOMRlF0PSkVrdgqju+G77UOm7e4hlF4mi/A55Bk=; b=u1d8Q26eUEXHkZhySTpiKEezsy1KXdpkI1vWz7/XI6/McbMu4nW5iU8JjKkcdR0Y8S Mio7IZf5SqcKAK2OJrjFhQl9Fu9j12a/bNAIqj4nMTmWlVC86CqZubDaB8crDZ5erQoY Yry0xnRh/hwsW5FKWC1Ek9TIDB0Gg6yfngAgWgzLPpcu6WPkjSf130N6kP/Oi3aQDkUe vHXT9sNg3lVviIfe9LTu5p0K7+5fmlTJTVTjkPAcuWOWQhq8jZUhxo+nYczLuxkaj7M6 WJjDf/bQgNg3NofNmdAu4ePUzZAIJkYEPQ/TSNDjQq6yHZYZ7LKerrAaX8dELSVdVBsu q/fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338oHWLkE9kheifgL4PAY7LNDur8WdUKZVNC6UNqv2C7RGGlQB/ RvHlxzjrtivKd8koC+gmzwUSMt0Qrlg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdP5Ku7YgmOZKLtAHKqPzmJwk3nKVzWPVbxZsupwx8z5++9jtBc/ulvZBnBBmMthepDqO+8A== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f801:: with SMTP id x1mr11979648qkh.171.1643588606332; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from wee.local (198.27.14-65.ip.mltn.standardbroadband.ca. [198.27.14.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay12sm390326qkb.127.2022.01.30.16.23.25 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 30 Jan 2022 16:23:25 -0800 (PST) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <0f83f174-eeca-30fb-7b98-77fb0da80f2e@gmail.com> <9E47A62E-3AAD-491E-9164-3DCAD22EC1F7@kdbarto.org> From: Nemo Nusquam Message-ID: <71ce6652-cf15-44db-01df-62ab89a5a134@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 19:23:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-CA Subject: Re: [TUHS] Compilation "vs" byte-code interpretation, was Re: Looking back to 1981 - what pascal was popular on what unix? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 2022-01-30 17:51, Dan Cross wrote (in part): > Not really. As an interesting aside, before Java became widespread I > heard folks mention "P-code" as a generic term for what most folks > mean when they say "bytecode." Now we often just say "bytecode." Wirth called his Pascal bytecode P-code and his Modula bytecode M-code.  Why did Gosling not call his bytecode "J-code"? >         - Dan C.