From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22444 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2020 11:59:37 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Jul 2020 11:59:37 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A23AB94EE2; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 21:59:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D808F94EBC; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 21:58:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 630EC94EBC; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 21:58:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se (ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.70]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 872EF94585 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 21:58:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3ED43F2DE; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:58:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Received: from ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9OYA2sywsj41; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (unknown [85.24.253.29]) (Authenticated sender: mc327956) by ste-pvt-msa1.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9F3BD3F29E; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D6D2E0325; Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:58:11 +0000 From: Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?= To: coff@tuhs.org Message-ID: <738ab925-586b-4921-b891-a4ec20348d4c@localhost> References: <20200711203020.GA1884@minnie.tuhs.org> <202007120222.06C2MtdJ140032@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <202007120222.06C2MtdJ140032@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU> Subject: Re: [TUHS] Monitoring by loudspeaker (was: BTL pranks) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" (This should probably be on COFF because I don't think this has much to do with UNIX.) On 11 Jul 2020 22:22 -0400, from doug@cs.dartmouth.edu (Doug McIlroy): > a loudspeaker hooked to the low-order bit of the accumulator played > gentle white noise in the background. The noise would turn into a > shriek when the computer got into a tight loop, How did that work? I can see how tying the low-order bit of the accumulator to a loudspeaker would generate white noise as the computer is doing work; but I fail to see how doing so would even somewhat reliably generate a shrieking sound when the computer is in a tight loop. Please, enlighten me. :-) -- Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael@kjorling.se “Remember when, on the Internet, nobody cared that you were a dog?”