From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29061 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2021 13:52:02 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Apr 2021 13:52:02 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 393F19CAFF; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:51:56 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2680F9C733; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:51:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vXXf2Gzo"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 987E39C733; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:51:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com (mail-qk1-f172.google.com [209.85.222.172]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694E49C723 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2021 23:51:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id g15so2203320qkl.4 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:51:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=ZjTM6YE7ioDgtQhY6Eat+PV5XFx+MzjpbZHqUZwVUXk=; b=vXXf2GzoxNWivMCxD11bV0hzEBZOA2mirlDS7JHwhNHqKCyYf2MJrIxCZHNgZnPA3/ zuFjXpk6FYFsUZePM4IGrqTgHrB23wykjDltbIJvi7hYGMPdeIgSrTe/vAJewgLTgwHi g9mC4rAciLUe1vvUQmVBTtxx/V+F3PFXOrgSUpjI8WYZe/4UtRnbkGYoEJeeooRQSNXg Rljni0dj6tevEwk/32j5EiHuyYwLaOF4bc0KOJfHQC0n35b4eMnyofvGLINPF58CCVdU r6AiEsmHA1NaklO8nWBxcq2hCA2cgY4vAEaaQ7LfHDrdkWB7f0WqmE0h5W21/KsViv27 dCNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=ZjTM6YE7ioDgtQhY6Eat+PV5XFx+MzjpbZHqUZwVUXk=; b=hYQaE6lbn4gHOKEEpLnnMS/n9H+XKOb8S5vZs4U5zYG88z9fJgOyQD7N2vHwelGald AoWL4ptXTMB1BKe4ffEplvA5R8PUnaaEsLVhnQ+K3ytqS6ppdmZ1hEDnBKPOy+bX0MBB 7fXVzO0kVhMcqZ2/3Q+4C4S8L88fknm+nBT1n+GlwXWDYXvfe2RkmVNgLpCqLE4lD+Ij 2sW0ErynCOFfIS/kvOaItbXmxhVsFlYccLp2zDMgSIdmgusncyRpVFjSPbZCJRoWLzgf 9o9WyDHEl6oderc47ttxvcV3aIJcqkTBc8YvvGZZIZBKFhTrf2neW94FIdU7opeuEDx1 EyEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AenPpFGSwspnldAMCAjChW9gvtBVdDyFBB7MHOELgEsrU4sRK 6ldC8Wlxzg1Dk/BrK5Rbwck5hwD1Kzo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbkGWWmdOQ+dcrpMnkiyu6JdZcY+KNoMF/Fh0IU6kbO4dnHoOYGHMzt/wjH6MXcaCVBUMwQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:b801:: with SMTP id i1mr8553929qkf.133.1617889890356; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wee.local (198.27.14-65.ip.mltn.standardbroadband.ca. [198.27.14.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y9sm20245604qkm.19.2021.04.08.06.51.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Apr 2021 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT) To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <1617722131.1272.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org> From: Nemo Nusquam Message-ID: <74677c0f-b22a-60df-aa11-2a191e021cba@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 09:51:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-CA Subject: Re: [TUHS] (no printed copy) (was (no subject)) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 2021-04-08 01:32, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, Norman Wilson wrote (in part): > >> I'm not sure why people, even in a group devoted to history like >> ours, focus so much on whether a journal is issued in print or only >> electronically.  The latter has become more and more common. > > Well, curling up in bed with a good PDF just doesn't quite feel the > same...  It's also handy in a waiting room (no battery to go flat and > not having to rely upon a WiFi connection) and also when waiting for > the local bus. In this informal survey, I side with Dave, though I prefer to read in my comfy well-lit chair with tea/coffee/cocoa.  (A very similar thread was aired on MO last year.) >> On one hand, I too find that if something is available only >> electronically I'm more likely to put off reading it, probably >> because back issues don't pile up as visibly. I fully concur -- I tend to completely forget about them.  Have advertisers actually tracked how many readers look at their ads in print vs. digital? N. > > I know the feeling :-)  I'm slowly working through my bookmarks. > > -- Dave