From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15616 invoked from network); 16 May 2020 18:37:07 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 May 2020 18:37:07 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5CA309C5EE; Sun, 17 May 2020 04:37:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F97A9C5E5; Sun, 17 May 2020 04:36:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=me.com header.i=@me.com header.b="sNB2yCNP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 844AA9C5E5; Sun, 17 May 2020 04:36:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from st43p00im-ztbu10073601.me.com (st43p00im-ztbu10073601.me.com [17.58.63.184]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8CE29C5E4 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 04:36:42 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1589654201; bh=PFel4suZEjXXFNipCgvw9z7jJuk0kOkoM1qAZ+cmXMY=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=sNB2yCNPUoz5TBkueGCkLd9WflKNLpov/51Z3OKbC68M64g2m4Y9usgFp00PEIc0w qbvmWi+QTCXi/XbcLBHQTcVKnknl5I8K1JzitB/4GxrFJuQgdQF+aXKYpDg+2in99b Rz6LB87em/wxbQOUZqxVqexJjcOIqnaZmHYWFrvp1uCz69CfyWw0HOVx2A7pUvOXmF 3KGHoVQdP/IKDPyhy8vXZge5zvJmuiiufdW046T5AwFkZiOhuPuh27TAYD29f2wh05 o5HDRQWrp/i6u4NbiG9ect0zULZTQ5awmViAVWzeuL2PNavza4sQlgve3W3B3fao0G f0vKC39iGJNHA== Received: from braeburn.fritz.box (aftr-37-201-227-165.unity-media.net [37.201.227.165]) by st43p00im-ztbu10073601.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5BA58206F8; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\)) In-Reply-To: <20200516181440.GA9805@indra.papnet.eu> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:36:38 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <75056802-3215-4E03-AEFE-F3681ACC722C@me.com> References: <15E49B16-E633-47B4-9CFB-42C863559CA4@me.com> <20200516181440.GA9805@indra.papnet.eu> To: Angelo Papenhoff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-16_11:2020-05-15, 2020-05-16 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=589 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2005160169 Subject: Re: [TUHS] 11/40 CPU (Emulation) test programs still available somewhere X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Michael Stiller via TUHS Reply-To: Michael Stiller Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org, Michael Stiller via TUHS Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Hi Angelo, i noticed your project recently and found it very interesting, but did = not hat the time to look at it in more detail. Maybe now it=E2=80=99s time to have a more in = depth look. Thanks for reminding me. Best regards, Michael > On 16. May 2020, at 20:14, Angelo Papenhoff wrote: >=20 > On 15/05/20, Michael Stiller via TUHS wrote: >> So the question is, are there programs V6 runnable or rk bootable = available which test the CPU >> functionality? I already hat a look at some xxdp disk, but the one i = found (while they boot) >> seem to lack basic cpu tests. >=20 > I wrote an 11/40 emulator too recently and used the diagnostics to > test it (in fact, that's all it has run so far..) > This is my testset: = https://github.com/aap/pdp11/blob/master/1140.c#L244 >=20 > Hope this helps, > aap