From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e568302d for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 01:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5F62DA1F09; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:15:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CE4A1A20; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:15:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b=hr3k4+Md; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 058C7A1A20; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:15:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (mail-qt0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63143A1A1C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:15:36 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id d4-v6so8020170qtn.13 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:15:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=L/XuFfsSbIiybNEv9mjsb1usso52a87zUoEoUQsp148=; b=hr3k4+MdaIS5r36tP/QEdWcg7FBGge796xwqPiTv4+gOZaHLBZjEHIxaNey2hoS34S zqO7a8A3Czxq6/vfbSJh02d3T7uTL2oqB0Q14J1PGx6BestM2t9iV+8X0q/Kn0y5kc+b g5NMHbNM6Db6HpVxsTuqY1UgEgdBcka1YUj1Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=L/XuFfsSbIiybNEv9mjsb1usso52a87zUoEoUQsp148=; b=Y9KhuPPH8nyRQGemuSq9nKgSgVhNsjoaQfCmifq78xnDmpL1eMyrZcqAR/GeD2ejHD UiZb3weh4CL8TkYF6JndUP1cHqvcL7ywd7ftZ6idERr+35xqokRirGMgKTh/9R/TtiY8 PyNoMzGWau4POkxMHJ3sNu+W1OI1mSQ/O821XDtqrsDStEJsDEQ00CmMAoIYUZaVodAH eehmR/164XLXMLpOh60pKD9/kJHKTQ4J7qCj8Fg4RP2E0pmIyzFb4tHQNd/EbAIT47HG JrrpWoGX1nj42UE7uVU4uQr69bTDDhD4lkIStPCPCZFhB1b5J2FPZGDSJzaLJjR6xPrp zxeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DGaCA5406lrLYfDfQ0FQHIO+pctcZioCVjbTf1vh51fnrvw8i8 IQ/MhYOUUeqzb8ahW7kLZcgkug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbVrldOWFN7cuAVJEdgHvsrqdM+do8XZ8LLwltm9FXOszo3snuSQ3SkyQ4gt1lj/11aoUlthA== X-Received: by 2002:aed:2101:: with SMTP id 1-v6mr9599758qtc.56.1535591735497; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.109] (pool-173-48-168-163.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.48.168.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m129-v6sm3288072qkb.8.2018.08.29.18.15.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Clem cole X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15G77) In-Reply-To: <69AFD606-5E1D-4060-95A5-22F33B2322B2@ccc.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:15:33 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79E2CC9D-1BD5-41F2-A052-FC328E9C3B7E@ccc.com> References: <20180829233605.GJ8423@mcvoy.com> <69AFD606-5E1D-4060-95A5-22F33B2322B2@ccc.com> To: Larry McVoy Subject: Re: [TUHS] cat -v and other complaints X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" And I should added I do miss inetd.conf in both cases. =20 Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.= =20 > On Aug 29, 2018, at 9:14 PM, Clem cole wrote: >=20 > Truth is I think IBM beat Sun on getting loadable modules for the kernel o= ut first. But I was counting the versions that people really looked at whic= h is why I give Linux credit. =20 >=20 > It makes sense they modeled on SunOS btw but the fact is the Linux version= is what folks like *BSD and macOS modeled after later. =20 >=20 > Btw you are 100% right - As for launchd I agree/no doubt - but I=E2=80=99= d already given up on MacOS being able to be admin=E2=80=99ed like a Unix bo= x. I can pretty much use it via iterm2 as a user like one and if mostly wor= ks as I expect (which I do appreciate). =20 >=20 > Linux is seductive enough to make think I should be able to admin it like I= have for the last 40 years and it then bites me when I least expect it. =20= >=20 > Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quit= e.=20 >=20 >>> On Aug 29, 2018, at 7:36 PM, Larry McVoy wrote: >>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:34:05AM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote: >>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, Clem Cole wrote: >>>> That said, I give the Linux folks great credit for the addition of modu= les >>>> was huge and it took BSD and the other UNIX systems a few years really >>>> pick up that idea in the same way (yes Solaris, Tru64 and eventually HP= UX >>>> etc.. had something too but again - my comment about being generally >>>> available applies). >>>=20 >>> Wasn't SunOS first with dynamic kernel modules, or is my memory worse th= an I >>> thought? Linux may have been around at the time, but we never used in t= he >>> shop until much later (Red Hat, nicknamed Dead Rat). >>=20 >> Yep. And Linux has loadable modules because I posted the SunOS 4.x man >> pages for the SunOS loadable modules to the kernel list. Proving once >> again that the open source guys aren't always the greatest at coming up >> with the ideas but once you show them that it can be done, it gets done >> quickly. I think they had a prototype working in a week. >>=20 >>> Never mind "systemd"; I'm having enough trouble coming to grips with >>> "launchd" on the Mac... Gimme /etc/inetd.conf any time. >>=20 >> Amen, brother.