From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 63710639 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 21:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A3D72A1EC4; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:32:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A2DA1DF7; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:32:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id AA510A1DF7; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:32:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [208.79.93.154]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC55A1DE5 for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:32:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from orthanc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orthanc.ca (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id adea3168; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:32:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: =?utf-8?B?Q8OhZw==?= In-reply-to: <20180903185616.ZnkRk%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> References: <20180831215636.-eCEx%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> <20180903180401.u4MVs%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> <20180903181133.GB81368@wopr> <20180903185616.ZnkRk%ca6c@bitmessage.ch> Comments: In-reply-to =?utf-8?B?Q8OhZw==?= message dated "Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:56:16 -0500." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <87583.1538343125.1@orthanc.ca> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:32:05 -0700 Message-Id: <7aa1b69655bc35bb@orthanc.ca> Subject: Re: [TUHS] cat -v and other complaints X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" > > "Unavailable on the console" is kind of a cheap shot when talking about > > an operating system that deliberately doesn't support consoles. Part of > > the point was outgrowing TTYs. > > Yeah, I guess I should've started with that :) I love Unix for the > console. But in Plan9, the console is assumed to be a bitmap device. Perhaps with the exception of, say, the file server. But there is no reason why that has to be the case - certainly not on modern "file server" hardware. It's just an artifact of how cpurc is set up. It's trivially changable, should you desire to. --lyndon