From: dscherrer@solar.stanford.edu (Deborah Scherrer)
Subject: [TUHS] ARPAnet now 4 nodes
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:18:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e135409-58d1-5e0e-1e75-8e195e88554f@solar.stanford.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ea322da-80e0-01b1-5fc4-1b78b740125a@gmail.com>
Don't know about nodes, but the initial research on the arpanet was done
at Lawrence Berkeley Lab. The primary goal of the project
was for scientists to share data. But, alas, the scientists didn't want
to share data. And, there were so many data formats that
nobody could read each other's anyway. So we ranked the arpanet as a
failure for that item. However, we found that it seemed
to be incredibly useful for communications amongst people, i.e. email...
Debbie
On 12/4/17 3:14 PM, Jon Forrest wrote:
>
>
> On 12/4/2017 3:06 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>> The ARPAnet reached four nodes on this day in 1969 (anyone know
>> which?); at least one "history" site reckoned the third node was
>> connected in 1977 (and I'm still waiting for a reply to my
>> correction). Well, I can believe that perhaps there were only three
>> left by then...
>
> One of the original 4 was my Alma Mater, UC Santa Barbara. I can
> say that even though it was one of the first four, its presence wasn't
> well known and nobody outside a select few in EE knew it was there.
>
> Jon Forrest
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 23:06 Dave Horsfall
2017-12-04 23:14 ` Jon Forrest
2017-12-04 23:18 ` Deborah Scherrer [this message]
2017-12-08 2:08 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-12-04 23:42 Noel Chiappa
2017-12-04 23:44 Noel Chiappa
2017-12-05 1:05 Noel Chiappa
2017-12-05 1:13 ` Deborah Scherrer
2017-12-05 1:38 ` Jon Forrest
2017-12-05 1:56 ` Deborah Scherrer
2017-12-05 2:52 Noel Chiappa
2017-12-05 3:10 ` Deborah Scherrer
2017-12-05 3:43 Noel Chiappa
2017-12-05 3:46 ` Deborah Scherrer
2017-12-05 3:49 ` Dan Cross
[not found] <mailman.395.1512445587.9955.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2017-12-05 8:14 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2017-12-05 8:24 ` Paul Ruizendaal
2017-12-05 14:46 ` Jon Forrest
2017-12-05 14:52 ` William Cheswick
2017-12-05 15:22 Noel Chiappa
2018-12-04 20:44 Dave Horsfall
2018-12-04 20:50 ` Clem Cole
2018-12-04 20:57 ` Clem Cole
2018-12-04 20:57 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2018-12-04 22:06 ` Jon Forrest
2018-12-04 22:14 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e135409-58d1-5e0e-1e75-8e195e88554f@solar.stanford.edu \
--to=dscherrer@solar.stanford.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).