From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 79bc3cde for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BC2B0A2230; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:12:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A18A1F9C; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 19:12:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7C19DA1F9E; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:16:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2232BA1F9C for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:16:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gHPCD-00067m-SS; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 08:16:17 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Warner Losh Organization: nocrew References: <7wftwpi4z7.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <068e3163f59e699e486287cf033dc226fbb59b87@webmail.yaccman.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 08:16:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Warner Losh's message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:37:31 -0600") Message-ID: <7w5zxjg88e.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] Archaic yacc C grammar X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Warner Losh wrote: > Steve Johnson wrote: > We actually had a pretty good system for making changes like > that. First, we would change the compiler to accept both the old and > the new. Then we would produce a warning that on a particular date > the old would no longer work. Then we made the old an error and > printed a message about how to fix it. > > How long a transition period did you typically have? I heard the V7 compiler still supports old B style initialization "int x 42;". So in some cases, a really long time.