From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7d134e3e for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3CCE994BF0; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:34:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3651C94BEA; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:34:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6F0CC94BEA; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:34:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CF694BE9 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 04:34:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h3Pk4-0008IT-Pn; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:33:40 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Larry McVoy Organization: nocrew References: <201903100731.x2A7VZJF033832@ducky.net> <7wpnqzj7tr.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <201903102253.x2AMrks8039290@ducky.net> <201903111728.x2BHSNqG045196@ducky.net> <20190311173845.GU31834@mcvoy.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:33:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20190311173845.GU31834@mcvoy.com> (Larry McVoy's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:38:45 -0700") Message-ID: <7w8sxlgt17.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] a possible source for 4.1BSD tapes X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Unix Heritage Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Larry McVoy wrote: > Other than for history's sake, I don't see the value of 4.1, it wasn't > a great release It may have some value if you want to have 4BSD networked through Chaosnet. MIT's Chaosnet patch applies on top of 4.1. I haven't checked 4.2.