From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31934 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2021 09:42:23 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Oct 2021 09:42:23 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 09ABC9D3EA; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:42:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24BF9D3A2; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:41:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C1D869D3A2; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:41:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834E99CCC6 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:41:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mg1ur-00072o-0k; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:41:45 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Organization: nocrew References: <20211025185015.C74C918C0B5@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:41:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20211025185015.C74C918C0B5@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> (Noel Chiappa's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:50:15 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <7wh7d1a3l3.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] Unix NCP protocol stack for ARPANET X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Noel Chiappa wrote: > this is just a terminological affliction among the CHAOS people, to > whom 'NCP' apparently meant 'protocol implementation' or 'network > code'. I always assumed this interpretation of "Network Control Program" was "software component that controls the network", and that this would apply equally well to many different networks.