From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16886 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2021 07:23:02 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Apr 2021 07:23:02 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E5DEF9C1D0; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:22:50 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753849BB66; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:22:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 506269BB66; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:22:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A819BB65 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:22:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lUlSy-00054n-P2; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:22:08 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Jason Stevens Organization: nocrew References: <0F0B9BFC06289346B88512B91E55670D3012@EXCHANGE> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:22:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: <0F0B9BFC06289346B88512B91E55670D3012@EXCHANGE> (Jason Stevens's message of "Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:31:48 +0800") Message-ID: <7wk0pb6hy7.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] SUN (Stanford University Network) was PC Unix X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "'tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org '" Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Jason Stevens wrote: > Is there any solid info on the Stanford SUN boards? I believe SAIL PDP-10 backup tapes have a large amount of files about the Stanford SUN project. But due to privacy concerns it would not be easy to make the information public. Maybe if there were a concerted effort to contact Vaughan Pratt, Andy Bechtolsheim, et al, and ask their permission.