From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31624 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2021 20:52:18 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Feb 2021 20:52:18 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E7A519C9AF; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:52:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3ED9BA43; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:51:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BA78F9BA43; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:51:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FD079BA40 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:51:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l7P7v-0000Kp-7S; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:51:51 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: John Cowan Organization: nocrew References: Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:51:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: (John Cowan's message of "Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:07:46 -0500") Message-ID: <7wk0rolvrs.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] 2^n-bit operands (Was reviving a bit of WWB) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" John Cowan wrote: > On the 36-bit PDP-10, things were better: the sign bit was mostly ignored > and five 7-bit ASCII characters were packed into each word, again with NUL > padding. (Line editors turned on the sign bit to indicate that this word > held an explicit ASCII line number.) It was not the sign bit but the least significant bit. The ILDB/IDPB byte instructions prefer it that way.