From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ed116e1a
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
	id 77F8C9C163; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:48 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7E39BFE6;
	Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:18 +1000 (AEST)
Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112)
 id 0F62D9BFE6; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:16 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219])
 by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733ED9BFE5
 for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 16:58:14 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org)
 by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <lars@nocrew.org>)
 id 1itnUK-0004Dp-ME; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:12 +0000
From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org>
To: Jon Steinhart <jon@fourwinds.com>
Organization: nocrew
References: <20200117195908.GF15253@ancienthardware.org>
 <20200118035051.GC481935@mit.edu>
 <20200118041913.GB67053@eureka.lemis.com>
 <20200119024900.GA15860@mit.edu>
 <20200119031225.GI67053@eureka.lemis.com>
 <20200119035808.GK67053@eureka.lemis.com>
 <20200119132551.GC15860@mit.edu> <m1itNo9-0036tPC@more.local>
 <CAKr6gn3Vhzn=g_55NdOQfQCUqi9YBSBZNbjM+YMoS8cg82PSbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC20D2ONRuze8sxOkiuWqYV7i6+vy9r3jGuM3P52fin2gQHKjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200120180432.GJ28686@mcvoy.com>
 <CAC20D2M70qm-sgK+Oq8c7EK2pDO+pdz=pL8VbE2C8tw=CwQE-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <202001201946.00KJk5er3071186@darkstar.fourwinds.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 06:58:12 +0000
In-Reply-To: <202001201946.00KJk5er3071186@darkstar.fourwinds.com> (Jon
 Steinhart's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:46:05 -0800")
Message-ID: <7wk15l70u3.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Early Linux and BSD
X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tuhs>,
 <mailto:tuhs-request@minnie.tuhs.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org
Sender: "TUHS" <tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org>

Jon Steinhart wrote:
> The 32032 made sense for the workstation division based on the data sheets.
> But, it turned out to be extremely buggy, and unlike the 68K I don't recall
> the ability to look at and patch the state of the microcode.

Did you have the ability to look at and patch the state of 68000
microcode?  How?