From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 427a6076 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 11835A1F7B; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:23:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551E4A1F06; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:22:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BEB8AA1F06; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:22:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57135A1EFF for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:22:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gWcNT-0006Ak-DB; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:22:47 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Grant Taylor via TUHS Organization: nocrew References: <940B149F-923C-4D12-B5D7-698DEA2E4F1F@ccc.com> <4c0c11da-1223-ab19-72ec-4effeeb63127@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 07:22:47 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4c0c11da-1223-ab19-72ec-4effeeb63127@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> (Grant Taylor via TUHS's message of "Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:55:19 -0700") Message-ID: <7wk1kg34u0.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [TUHS] 2.9bsd with networking on 18-bit possible? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Grant Taylor Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Grant Taylor wrote: > What protocols did 2.9BSD support? Did it have NCP? Or was it > strictly serial protocols like interactive terminals / UUCP? > > Would it be any easier to use an external NCP to TCP/IP gateway? It's actually a challenge to find *any* NCP software today. I think it would be interesting to recreate a small ARPANET. Here's a copy of "Network Unix" from Illinois: https://github.com/larsbrinkhoff/network-unix-v6