From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 3478 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2023 18:51:19 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 28 Jan 2023 18:51:19 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78609424F2; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 04:51:10 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C53424DB for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2023 04:51:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLqHy-0002Ez-Cf; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:50:58 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Paul Ruizendaal Organization: nocrew References: <0C5D8AF8-BAB2-48B5-854B-34E3A949DE50@planet.nl> <0778FF74-7DF5-4072-95F3-5FF5BEB4CC33@planet.nl> <7wpmaz9g2p.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <697E8876-C2A9-4FE6-A2F7-B4DCEC3BA2C7@planet.nl> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:50:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <697E8876-C2A9-4FE6-A2F7-B4DCEC3BA2C7@planet.nl> (Paul Ruizendaal's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2023 12:05:51 +0100") Message-ID: <7wlelma3xp.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lars@nocrew.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on junk.nocrew.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Message-ID-Hash: WT3IFOZBQZ63UBW7SAJ3MDLPHE7FWYRS X-Message-ID-Hash: WT3IFOZBQZ63UBW7SAJ3MDLPHE7FWYRS X-MailFrom: lars@nocrew.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: "tuhs@tuhs.org" X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Earliest UNIX Workstations? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Paul Ruizendaal wrote: >> V source code exists, right? It seems likely W would have been >> written in the same language as [V]. And that early X would also be >> the same. Another source of information would be to ask Bob >> Scheifler and Jim Gettys. > > Whilst that is a reasonable assumption, I=E2=80=99m not sure it is true in > this case. Bob Scheifler writes in 1986: > > "We acquired a UNIX-based version of W for the [VS1OO] (with > synchronous communication over TCP [24] produced by Asente and Chris > Kent at Digital=E2=80=99s Western Research Laboratory.=E2=80=9D > > It does not say =E2=80=9CC based=E2=80=9D, but it is quite possible that = the Unix port > also meant moving to C. I checked V, and it's written in C.