From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 21736 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2022 06:39:07 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Jul 2022 06:39:07 -0000
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445AA406DE;
	Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:38:45 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD4364068E
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 16:38:35 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org)
	by junk.nocrew.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <lars@nocrew.org>)
	id 1oCbRh-0003kc-3P; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:38:33 +0000
From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org>
To: segaloco <segaloco@protonmail.com>
Organization: nocrew
References: <7wmtdcx870.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
	<0ba593c4-db60-1bc8-2531-c64e4937f285@jfloren.net>
	<7wa69by6h7.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
	<owojoHb7IL-_r5qPUpGf3KOKYcDaO6stXQqVdvlwQ1OPleOBiXKf9hHSQV6mTvwb0FvNui_a4epoy4BBJztCCNRLXP1M7JjT7y012fx8LKo=@protonmail.com>
	<7w1qunxz8p.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
	<VtxDj_Co-tRgUGmB9ntbtLTSy6wn4zO0gHTjaXmmXNdVsubFsMbMCMjBGGzAEbS7x2hX9l88Wy-vi4aeu_PJX7BZyYtcy43M3bt6TAyCc5E=@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:38:33 +0000
In-Reply-To: <VtxDj_Co-tRgUGmB9ntbtLTSy6wn4zO0gHTjaXmmXNdVsubFsMbMCMjBGGzAEbS7x2hX9l88Wy-vi4aeu_PJX7BZyYtcy43M3bt6TAyCc5E=@protonmail.com>
	(segaloco@protonmail.com's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:50:53
	+0000")
Message-ID: <7wlestwoie.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lars@nocrew.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on junk.nocrew.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: XF776U3ZG3YUTF3TUMVT5LRV2CT4EJ2S
X-Message-ID-Hash: XF776U3ZG3YUTF3TUMVT5LRV2CT4EJ2S
X-MailFrom: lars@nocrew.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tuhs@tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: Unix V8 Chaosnet, any takers?
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/XF776U3ZG3YUTF3TUMVT5LRV2CT4EJ2S/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

segaloco wrote:
> This looks like it might be exactly what you're looking for:
> http://9legacy.org/9legacy/doc/simh/v8

Thanks!

> That said, your original posting mentions the PDP-11, but also
> "Berkeley Unix Nodes". For the latter, do you mean VAX?

Yes, they are VAX-11/780 SIMH instances running 4.1BSD + MIT patches.

> I don't know whether V8 ran on PDP-11 or not, but if that's your
> intent, you may want to start with a 2.xBSD or V7 as a base instead.

The Chaosnet documentation says there were PDP-11 Unix V7 nodes on the
network.  That code has not been found though.  Same goes for VAX/VMS.