From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17853 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2023 16:22:16 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (2600:3c01:e000:146::1) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Jun 2023 16:22:16 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C15425BB; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 02:22:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F7B425BA for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 02:22:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org) by junk.nocrew.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q6vv5-0007Bf-No; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:21:59 +0000 From: Lars Brinkhoff To: Clem Cole Organization: nocrew References: <1e651370-3ada-e211-c277-409d6563500d@f4grx.net> Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:21:59 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Clem Cole's message of "Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:57:30 -0400") Message-ID: <7wttvj5jko.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lars@nocrew.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on junk.nocrew.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Message-ID-Hash: EWUZZ45UN4RW4OCVXGO3FP7MMRV4A3UE X-Message-ID-Hash: EWUZZ45UN4RW4OCVXGO3FP7MMRV4A3UE X-MailFrom: lars@nocrew.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Sebastien F4GRX , tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Software written in B List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Clem Cole writes: > Interestingly, I also have no memory of a B implementation for the PDP-10, > which like GE/Honeywell systems, was 36-bit, word addressed. PDP-10 had BCPL (two!) which was somewhat popular, so maybe it did't need a pared-down version. Same goes for TX-2 if you want to talk 36-bit (who doesn't). > I used BLISS and SAIL on those, if not the assembler. SAIL begat Mainsail, wich in theory could still be around today... for Unix, he said on-topicly!