From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4015cabd for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8356C94BD1; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:53:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F361B9480A; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:53:17 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.b="wut8jS8f"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C32489480A; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:53:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1320074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.132.74]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E77947D8 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:53:14 +1000 (AEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SyQWgXT5EFUm3xbAHVOSrhALSbj1YCsCeUlk/aDJXh5CH03xlRqv5pGnBmMzFFW/K0qM/0l9nSg348vvI32cT2RKihvnidfaroG/zGVHJh9haiBgVepxnUgrWCCcN0EF4efPQ+PNRpxcXPuiTKiZndFya5UVtgF/c55o4TZUuoDZPLif5hX3IuuWByzyW8UvWBGRdB9fP9kPt23ZhG/LPW1eFAE4bIQao23ERyz3+lXPdP0D8ulcXgLrS/uv6Nz0JyTPcA35xG62iRs8fQ8LR+gUS2Yk01x6B7+dVR4JXY1r17XLb0GQsbGVyK6lX4Omuum7AjdVnxX6P2CSAqATqw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=u06pUdVpeo8LcRf1KQJTOBf66X/czLeh5N5Yox44pWE=; b=TMI8PgmCVUPxo5YmJT70Io2HVa7OejuXf8fC4+5ojHuPr6vtl4xpPUvyGw88qhDZsMNtG7YrvYMTDYn/y86VTnjR/WE84mT8e8thgM+0+57zD6uTqmF46BIhKf4EBBltdcyKC6GegVXNj+KUNyHBVKTlsJuK5/p/Tn3SDrK5dhYSWO9ZMoK1r16XyqUM3Qrp1xQyaDl+ycRW9Eo2VL5cXHcYnsWALG42IQ6Z+IhHMm3WcqWjXJOa97pCGbn3kcrn70UkHYGLsq5wAXeM3laQVNd2KM3B2Nn29mB1v1kz5V+Cqa9MY3L6Kh30V/t136CQjzYNYwpATjJgOf91mB9lDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=fail (sender ip is 59.148.14.54) smtp.rcpttodomain=tuhs.org smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com;dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com;dkim=none (message not signed);arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-outdoorexpressionslimited-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=u06pUdVpeo8LcRf1KQJTOBf66X/czLeh5N5Yox44pWE=; b=wut8jS8fTrgcsDXNS+LRD26GqlrZDlVCePb2sFmCjmMFcylF/oc1BW+ULaOlJwe12yozDxVeVD6AU8XM+s4QpkdIYAO6VCVwuROyQMJJbtBoZBuBA/+Hh+Quc7mqvSBj8BDySPdBlvMAWXkRy1MxI0x0AGhDHWjAg5g5HLFWiEo= Received: from HK2PR02CA0157.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:201:1f::17) by HK0PR02MB2676.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:60::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2073.10; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:53:11 +0000 Received: from PU1APC01FT026.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7ebd::207) by HK2PR02CA0157.outlook.office365.com (2603:1096:201:1f::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2073.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:53:10 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 59.148.14.54) smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com; tuhs.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;tuhs.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com; Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of superglobalmegacorp.com does not designate 59.148.14.54 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=59.148.14.54; helo=exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; Received: from exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local (59.148.14.54) by PU1APC01FT026.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.2052.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 14:53:10 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:192.168.1.10] (HUANANZHIX79 [192.168.1.10]) by exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NPGTFFL4; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:53:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "tuhs@tuhs.org" From: Jason Stevens Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:53:02 +0800 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9EA69F8B-D0B6-4684-89EB-354267CB0BBE_" Message-ID: <8235a090-c48a-4587-8974-23305233bc33@PU1APC01FT026.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:59.148.14.54; IPV:NLI; CTRY:HK; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(376002)(346002)(396003)(39830400003)(2980300002)(1110001)(339900001)(199004)(189003)(508600001)(74316002)(476003)(105606002)(2906002)(54896002)(9686003)(186003)(86362001)(6306002)(336012)(2501003)(31696002)(71190400001)(356004)(6666004)(5660300002)(5640700003)(8676002)(26005)(1730700003)(81686011)(81166006)(81156014)(2351001)(36906005)(8936002)(70586007)(126002)(31686004)(70206006)(486006)(316002)(33964004)(16586007)(6916009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HK0PR02MB2676; H:exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; FPR:; SPF:Fail; LANG:en; PTR:059148014054.ctinets.com; A:1; MX:1; X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: fd9a48b0-e163-48e0-70e4-08d7060f7de0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328); SRVR:HK0PR02MB2676; X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK0PR02MB2676: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0095BCF226 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 4R/7ifh8JcIQpwuKgmEZMFXGnAm08HeRHCVcPn9F/yiTP/JKbEbGQPCBHNkkXxRKs861ZlUqjKAgTI5HLe3+CZj71+qIhEI0ZFE31h6aY7UUvsoS+EvRw6ovC3EEq+VQS9bAQXvJhiTJgDoyVicHNoG6h9af28icSAuy5atk21bLAPKeilruzaQGUCHo8HQEL+CNjH7w0ErPxhasQIgnP453uP4Vikdlh0j+bfRUirZFvT2Qz1vmzfCnTcYZFBd1/M93FTUQss/QooC2uxCL8K8UL6tWlJl0bDohLIY+yzpsZt/5HsgnEfnSVqC5NKmPW5X8q3ziARu/sZpwhJ9/vpNzHaZpcSTk2mZ7Fq9qnw+aDwTT77sIQM52Brk+EaXmGN765lx/LIgOQ0r3aEmPbRPoL28aYe+a/YpAPBwT0tc= X-OriginatorOrg: superglobalmegacorp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2019 14:53:10.0209 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fd9a48b0-e163-48e0-70e4-08d7060f7de0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9; Ip=[59.148.14.54]; Helo=[exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK0PR02MB2676 Subject: [TUHS] PCC for the i386 X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --_9EA69F8B-D0B6-4684-89EB-354267CB0BBE_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Does anyone know where the 386 port from PCC came from? While trying to build a Tahoe userland for the i386, it seems that everythi= ng was built with GCC=E2=80=A6 Was there a PCC for the i386 around =E2=80=9988-90? It seems after the rap= id demise of the Tahoe/Harris HCX-9 that the non Vax/HCX-9 platforms had moved to GCC? Also anyone know any good test software for LIBC? I=E2=80=99ve been tracin= g through some strange issues rebuilding LIBC from Tahoe, where I had to include some bits= from Reno to get diropen to actually work. I would imagine there ought to have = been some platform exercise code to make sure things were actually working instead of= say building as much as you can, and playing rogue for a few hours to make sure its stable enough.=20 --_9EA69F8B-D0B6-4684-89EB-354267CB0BBE_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

Does anyone know where the 386 port = from PCC came from?

 

While trying to build a Tahoe userland for the i386, it seems = that everything was built with GCC=E2=80=A6

Was the= re a PCC for the i386 around =E2=80=9988-90?=C2=A0 It seems after the rapid= demise of the Tahoe/Harris

HCX-9 = that the non Vax/HCX-9 platforms had moved to GCC?

 

Also anyone know any good test software for LIBC?= =C2=A0 I=E2=80=99ve been tracing through some

strange issues rebuilding LIBC from Tahoe, wh= ere I had to include some bits from

Reno to get diropen to actually work.=C2=A0 I would ima= gine there ought to have been some

platform exercise code to make sure things were actually= working instead of say

building as much as you can, and playing rogue for a few hours to m= ake sure

its sta= ble enough.

= --_9EA69F8B-D0B6-4684-89EB-354267CB0BBE_--