From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8a7d3aee for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 21:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 143B69C20F; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:24:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFED9C205; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:24:03 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rDl8MmBb"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 625D59C1FF; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:24:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com (mail-pg1-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E3C9C14A for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:24:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q127so2208597pga.4 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:24:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TQS8XG2PY8hhJEUpx+4WTPwXBFvucC7z/VSdNcZYsr8=; b=rDl8MmBbn6Se4pAJygJ+5Ik9m00S4pZ/sjX+dGV77mrflyRtUta6i8Sd4sK/1zZ68c Xij4f0zebQI866PRD0MxPQzntZQf9+cSsIbZz3cZlURrl1ZzpJO+npnKEe2MnyGeYzu+ b7a9r0nrWr0UmSrbU5yJbrWwd32uhTnFNfZ0SO2TWLSXt7m/ObQ0T8n6UAheHer+8K/1 H5G/40mFlX9bCUoCDxg4Sfsk4bdvqLq1POJnwEAQaEM3U0BYz3srhTCTUgPWH/tPc6Nm kst/V5AxLNbMdAOTrdDurQhl+qYrr1Da5bKpaVOWbjI5f+2uYFJvk0GHGayVOi2PFo8/ PZcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TQS8XG2PY8hhJEUpx+4WTPwXBFvucC7z/VSdNcZYsr8=; b=XacCAf+YSvt6Rb1ysuKUu4/3BVGYtwYOqBJK1j9I1zcLypFThg5Zn3FSPaO5a/ehaY kblzIOTGv3jqufhO7byPCVMA9nMajegts8IED4AFgwyNYbPJJYw9RTVN42CH/UZ4VvVZ zRi7L/UXXrkBL0ssQRyhgNx01zgiR5NLmtKMOsiBMU6rDGX5vrJm7l/f1NKt5qzIuL9l FTJ8v8R3ot8AHbLvaMWTlEGfnHBhekr/Y6cZnfZIvJYbew/SvZmaIsUR2YCL6hl3cAXI GHA94FkZH6O27s7UcEoitynbGm32wdLLKHh7ovIUarX+qigp3aIemX9WxNLLZGsXQ4JF rdUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+uZqX9G47LXAPIxRburD7kwt9Uu29z25+pOnSjEeaGxuhvX8o eGqEgR5LdJEKpjyTYcqljeeEbNQakao= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwtZx4EARtGNB1rSUH/QSOy6fIpko6vUxrnwDUk5Q7OvY1fVdx0O4pmlwj5WwOxuJmuklWN3w== X-Received: by 2002:a63:447:: with SMTP id 68mr7800866pge.364.1579641839761; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (157-131-108-81.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net. [157.131.108.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o184sm41555277pgo.62.2020.01.21.13.23.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:23:59 -0800 (PST) To: Henry Bent References: From: Jon Forrest Message-ID: <83795ac7-9ea1-82ba-d7c2-4f9705ca8935@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:24:00 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [TUHS] Unix on Zilog Z8000? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 1/21/2020 10:15 AM, Henry Bent wrote: > There's been a lot of discussion about early Unix on Intel, National > Semi, Motorola, and Sparc processors. I don't recall if Unix ran on > the Z8000, and if not, why not. > > > A tiny bit of research would have answered this question for you: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zilog_Z8000#Z8000_CPU_based_systems True, but sometimes oldtimers like those of us who hang out here remember additional, or different, things than what Wikipedia pages say. Jon