From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
To: Paul Ruizendaal <pnr@planet.nl>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] PC Unix
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 11:04:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <840.1617818669@hop.toad.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2313BFBA-8795-497F-AD46-46CCFC0E6E6C@planet.nl>
Paul Ruizendaal <pnr@planet.nl> wrote:
> Although some sources suggest that going with the 68000 and/or Unix were considered, it would have left the new machine without an instant base of affordable small business applications. Speed to market was a leading paradigm for the PC's design team.
Sun was making 68000-based systems in 1981, before the IBM PC was created.
But they only sold in small volumes, maybe a few thousand systems per year.
What I remember hearing was that IBM asked Motorola if they could make
250,000 68000 chips for the PC's first year. They said no. Intel said
yes to making 250,000 8088 chips, so they got the business.
It's great that Intel is finally losing the edge that they once had in
chip fabrication, because it was married to such rotten taste in
computer architecture. Perhaps over the next 30 years the industry can
finally evolve to less insane designs. (Even AMD is better than Intel
at architecture; they created a 64-bit x86 that was so reasonable that
Intel ended up adopting it.)
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-07 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-07 8:20 [TUHS] PC Unix Paul Ruizendaal
2021-04-07 18:04 ` John Gilmore [this message]
2021-04-07 22:18 ` Thomas Paulsen
2021-04-07 22:40 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-07 23:04 ` Jon Steinhart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-07 7:52 Paul Ruizendaal via TUHS
2021-04-07 15:57 ` heinz
2021-04-08 22:31 ` Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=840.1617818669@hop.toad.com \
--to=gnu@toad.com \
--cc=pnr@planet.nl \
--cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).