From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17C022FA6 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:35:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB6143C7E; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:34:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAD943C7D for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:34:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7061365d2f3so1192749b3a.3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:34:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718930094; x=1719534894; darn=tuhs.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MvYqaQvavVFb/G3XJQR5CusWFuT9/uJsPIz4n81WB3Y=; b=ikkp8AMm5iZYb00Wp9GHRR0T5AWne6DS8KDZD02eUUC/Myiy1t+s1Yo6QcgeKWsJct 3D/o+E7eFfijrc/BbJN4WJUpSpFHmOOBWUX10R71PivCC9zbfklBWF6KfErnm+EdgObA DzW2ZBPfUVttaDniVEaoK6ihbrh9MiuJoNszidbKwBdT1002t0QPEVTSty6lTK7f3DOz xvphf5qFjs3ZrL9KOAUApNy+Y8iHp3ftvp6ukkc9KzWZ+dzjp9qWtQIduemXF2PNqtVE oAHUMfvns7TfzRsUjkQYOqcyPUVxMwrrYAIl/jiEpZXouoHmbF3JWDTE32dFttN+4ekX 1eEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718930094; x=1719534894; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MvYqaQvavVFb/G3XJQR5CusWFuT9/uJsPIz4n81WB3Y=; b=e9sJMfKPAjXyE2IecO6RpaonZfPRniXU7Rz8WVMI+yZ7mMzcVAywWVg3wvf1ZP/VvG goTjVX4cV2S/XRWAag5cHlKKAooGGbkduTAYwHIkEz0bi6fvdeufosf/W46DOxrrgRoE YYdcaGnUNZeUBQa5eaQFAC8kvcU+F7P6iCb8bRZURvq63+rWjQ7rcyp0wl7uGyVhuPYA MC3I+/khRuCLA/QvBHlEupPAoTQJZBzW4Ms/21qieWlShuTz/ip8Tl75OwDBvdtuFIVV Zpcv32IsyjzbUstbNaTwuRBOwP2mRdvli+7CsVy0TDwqgjtoiUiw9bSwOixCyFQSC6d1 5zgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzW5DarH/okrfWE+7FiPeWsJZwBwck3mFvqM5AcwIoNbGXLFXP0 7vJAxA99UKl8dxHVCF4hZ8B92vMR/Vk1439QBOgjFqfbKBB66aIKgOprTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHBeJBHKnlLFZ+Wka7eBZKp97CdQlB+sRtUHhGd8B3t5C5wagGZE1VcGu0+Kg4xZwP5rIrogg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:aa1a:0:b0:705:e489:e86d with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70629c15232mr7100697b3a.7.1718930093540; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([101.119.161.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-706512d6088sm244691b3a.175.2024.06.20.17.34.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:34:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexis To: The Unix Heritage Society In-Reply-To: (Warner Losh's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:05:29 -0600") References: <87jzikt900.fsf@gmail.com> <877cej5gsp.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:34:46 +1000 Message-ID: <87jzijf80p.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID-Hash: NOUJIIF3BKWDLTPVJJPBW24RJYX3LP3V X-Message-ID-Hash: NOUJIIF3BKWDLTPVJJPBW24RJYX3LP3V X-MailFrom: flexibeast@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Building programs (Re: Version 256 of systemd boasts '42% less Unix philosophy' The Register List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Warner Losh writes: > Isn't that what thecautoconf cache is for? There's a cross-project cache? That is, a cache not just for the project for which autoconf was run, but for _all_ software built on that machine? (Over the decades i've regularly observed instances where autoconf doesn't seem to be making use of results of its previous runs for a particular project; i don't know if that's because the build maintainer didn't configure autoconf correctly. My own dev/doc work hasn't required me to wrestle with autoconf.) Alexis.