From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8469224E4E for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 02:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3F543CA3; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:04:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF64042A8B for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:04:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f44b594deeso22050725ad.2 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719014674; x=1719619474; darn=tuhs.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rM9oDdhZJou3UZiTBlbBvOJ+YNnEGQ4ZDZBAqHpvBj4=; b=jEXRPkjSdcYQTbJFuxqyK0S+hBwzv7kC9ktStBEFSA9rOGeoPTQ6VJZELrboUsCrXS zs9lzvchQpYm+T7AFfwyJg0e9DQnDaqVkNTUd6+3UH3SbvTrw9iPBYZOz7W65J4O9sJ7 wu0MVzl0TU1vSnc4OYGwQQcTkQ8lCTu4ReBJiW9/IqmLjlxZZSy6PZPpir1v2kKPPWLz jiJcBg1AUci7bU0QdKCwXoBgQA+x2yYRNdWUH70BmygXsw1RTaFt77/rgi59piXMaN5k d659Yh5V9XtyZEKm0uYGZQjEo2FhC/5Xmy9g07cjfaqhOvTDYNt5YJ+OS02PnstckkCK 8Bjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719014674; x=1719619474; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rM9oDdhZJou3UZiTBlbBvOJ+YNnEGQ4ZDZBAqHpvBj4=; b=PmzemCeR+jNVHfTklbpkp/mgNKHcXotMWJRmHEntqxk9r6E2PKypuhzVxfXQQqjr/0 jPEw6uvd4QoYJWB4AYGuKl53rRF9YiP0j/gHhAsFHKZAaXjbU8dV8jKH0w5ctzoJQ2zw 63l/QiVeLmVN/BFpVTTL2c5YsOSAY3FwWJftiZKdpXYNDlQhS9bDJv+Hvkh7OTXtoyJu aN1Jbvtsioh+6dLW9ZNcNME4WECjqtDT2MZVV0+sTPwSiPTmV8qYbk1efTJd9BF3gbRT aJnGSPCoQEiJCvx/Yx+GluGPCLdRinuKeYzOIKWmw5QEFCZgCeAhXIiyHnux8zinX1nC kCCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwC5UrDkAgc+3LZn0M5jyKerk8ovuF+uNO63RTdCaNu6pY3vVJ6 XaXEUgQIxFD8qZtSgB6bM2IQba4CSmcktYqYxi6KNyHxBk5UPC/XAgjqAg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHLGOyFbhRXDvryuY+Z1ugLIYz82FyWtbLWazU0QotXc9BA7h6O3pxi0N7dMBpWqfaOvqI/Lg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce8a:b0:1e0:bae4:48f9 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f9aa42e7a1mr110447755ad.32.1719014673789; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([101.119.161.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-1f9eb2f0438sm19898635ad.14.2024.06.21.17.04.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:04:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexis To: The Unix Heritage Society In-Reply-To: (Chet Ramey via TUHS's message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:57:44 -0400") References: <87jzikt900.fsf@gmail.com> <877cej5gsp.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:04:29 +1000 Message-ID: <87le2xvo4y.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID-Hash: ZUXKWOKQFMSQQQWDWYUL34PSGG7LW34W X-Message-ID-Hash: ZUXKWOKQFMSQQQWDWYUL34PSGG7LW34W X-MailFrom: flexibeast@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Building programs (Re: Version 256 of systemd boasts '42% less Unix philosophy' The Register List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Chet Ramey via TUHS writes: > On 6/20/24 7:35 PM, Alexis wrote: >> If i compile something on one of my OpenBSD boxen in the >> morning, >> and then compile some other thing in the afternoon, without an >> OS >> upgrade in-between, autoconf isn't going to find that libc.so >> has >> changed in-between. > > configure and config.cache compute the results for a given build > environment. If you change that, whose responsibility is it to > update > the > dependencies? Sorry, i'm not sure i understand your question, particularly given that i was writing about the situation where a fundamental part of the build environment _hasn't_ changed .... Could you please elaborate or rephrase? Alexis.