From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: krewat@kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat)
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 11:54:15 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] System Economics (was is Linux "officially branded UNIX")
In-Reply-To: <58c9623b.law1Aw2ufj3DFNA1%schily@schily.net>
References: <CAC20D2OcXnAmBdCEM3GLkOqqW=X96aF3AGQv=yWrd93NeSF9TA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170314153815.GA32726@mcvoy.com>
 <9deec795-ecd6-7924-c10f-b722ee388a0c@kilonet.net>
 <20170314155718.GH32139@yeono.kjorling.se>
 <47c38ea0-accb-407b-26c8-6b4877657b21@kilonet.net>
 <CAC20D2OhodnTWZ1GWOJCbBwefq7H=Dn+ZvN=z1fFy4O9CP8BMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ddfb5858-5817-99b3-67fb-34cdc60314ed@kilonet.net>
 <20170315143228.GG25424@yeono.kjorling.se>
 <e9f54c27-837b-9e95-1355-47c40a1001dd@kilonet.net>
 <58c9623b.law1Aw2ufj3DFNA1%schily@schily.net>
Message-ID: <8949cc1a-b5c9-6640-6f82-e18e1ab678a0@kilonet.net>

Sorry, in this context, SunOS means 4.1.4 - not Solaris SVR4

I run Solaris myself, and love it.

On 3/15/2017 11:48 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Arthur Krewat <krewat at kilonet.net> wrote:
>
>> You make a valid point, and re-reading what I wrote, I find that I
>> pushed the example too far :)
>>
>> The subject was originally that SunOS at it's end-of-life did not have
>> the features that Linux now does, and comparing their development
>> lengths brings up an interesting question. What would SunOS have become
> So you believe that SunOS-5.11 is no longer alive?
>
> There is an Oracle based version and a OpenSolarisd based version developed by
> the community.
>
> Jörg
>