From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3fe3a21f for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id ED7FB9E5C2; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:46:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D189E5BE; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:45:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=tnetconsulting.net header.i=@tnetconsulting.net header.b=2K7GILt0; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 47D279E5BE; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:45:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net [45.33.28.24]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B069E5BD for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:45:51 +1000 (AEST) Received: from REDACTED (drscriptt-2-pt.tunnel.tserv1.den1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:39:62a:0:0:0:2]) (authenticated bits=0) by tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTPSA id w5P1jn4r008413 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:45:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tnetconsulting.net; s=2015; t=1529891150; bh=PhSdOdH+YSa3LzITZZoxu6e58D2I66Gqx540rNOWy5Y=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Content-Disposition:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:MIME-Version:References:Reply-To:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Sender:Subject:To:User-Agent; b=2K7GILt0eyqEy88CzfHChMxps11wK8SwPYqlJW0UnjMnP1UqQi4Hhn+sy2GP5u4Do TbxqYbfwd+pxhtH9/kJ4F2ROw6Kp+g7fFaqNNUL+bheZOUP/yJg6RIbMpvxniJhcxf C3iHMVt3tstmhyIBPPRGUU3ncJEH57TNOSqMSOsU= To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <20180624131458.6E96518C082@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Organization: TNet Consulting Message-ID: <8a81f6fb-5689-f0b4-49e3-5871c4d3a402@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:46:51 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [TUHS] off-topic list X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Grant Taylor via TUHS Reply-To: Grant Taylor Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 06/24/2018 07:38 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > The only updates I've seen to BIND in recent years were > security-related, not functionality.  Yeah, I could switch to another > DNS server, but like Sendmail vs. Postfix[*] it's better the devil you > know etc... I've seen the following features introduced within the last five years: - Response Policy Zone has added (sub)features and matured. - Response Policy Service (think milter like functionality for BIND). - Catalog Zones - Query Minimization - EDNS0 Client Subnet support is being worked on. That's just what comes to mind quickly. -- Grant. . . . unix || die