From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A042C21FAC
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Tue,  2 Jul 2024 19:16:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A275F427AC;
	Wed,  3 Jul 2024 03:16:09 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [208.79.93.154])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1333D426C6
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Wed,  3 Jul 2024 03:16:04 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from orthanc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by orthanc.ca (Orthanc SMTPD) with ESMTP id 369e3ebf;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: Rich Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAFH29tp=_7fH57W0YcbSaXr5pptAQhMR666d0tpsjnZuMSnM8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8cf014a96b87b641@orthanc.ca> <CAC20D2P_qKk7xmJYiOUvO=f5yG9-+etio69_7YSrbmeyxmAAOw@mail.gmail.com> <8cf0151b4a0d863a@orthanc.ca> <CAFH29tp=_7fH57W0YcbSaXr5pptAQhMR666d0tpsjnZuMSnM8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Rich Salz <rich.salz@gmail.com>
   message dated "Tue, 02 Jul 2024 12:32:23 -0400."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <70271.1719940563.1@orthanc.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:16:03 -0700
Message-ID: <8cf0159b519f1596@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: GNFFTEEM5B6YN5AQJN7RDMEDSSWYQJYH
X-Message-ID-Hash: GNFFTEEM5B6YN5AQJN7RDMEDSSWYQJYH
X-MailFrom: lyndon@orthanc.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tuhs@tuhs.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: seismo/uunet uucp
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/GNFFTEEM5B6YN5AQJN7RDMEDSSWYQJYH/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

Rich Salz writes:

> Almost definitely, anything Seismo/UUNET/Rick did would be passed back to
> CSRG.

But did it?  I don't remember seeing it in any of the source trees
I was monkeying with.  Not that that means much.  But I also don't
remember ever seeing a non-gnu UUCP associated with any post-4.2 
release.  Thus leading back to my original question ...

> You're going to glue TLS to UUCP?  You know it's interactive (two way)
> protocol, right?

Yup.  It's just wrapping the connection with TLS, ala https vs http.
People have been doing it for decades (e.g. suucp in more tha a few
/etc/services files).  With HDB you can arrange this by doing some
contortions in the Dialers file that make it call out to 'openssl
s_client ...' IIRC.  It has been a looong time ...

--lyndon