From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: brantley@coraid.com (Brantley Coile)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:30:23 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] SunOS 4.1.1?
In-Reply-To: <20070921.111435.-108811893.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <9552c7c8500326acee33a5cbe54df693@coraid.com>

BSD never used anything that would have been covered by the System III
or System V license.  The ancient Unix license would be fine for that.
Howver, I'm pretty sure there is a lot of stuff in SunOS 4 that was from
System III and System V.

To restate, BSD *.* is legal under the Ancient Unix license,
which covers 32V and earlier.  Berkeley never had a liscense
for anything later than 32V.

> In message: <102AD3A8-168F-4407-9FA1-86CB2B97A198 at tfeb.org>
>             Tim Bradshaw <tfb at tfeb.org> writes:
> : On 21 Sep 2007, at 15:58, John Cowan wrote:
> : 
> : >
> : > The best available story for the Sun3 code is that Sun doesn't
> : > object to non-commercial use (which certainly is not the same
> : > as an open source license).
> : 
> : I'm assuming that the source isn't available at all (I wonder if Sun  
> : still have it?)
> 
> SunOS for the Sun3 machines was derived from BSD 4.2 with a lot of
> code from other places.  BSD 4.2 requires an AT&T license because
> there is still AT&T code in it.  As such, open sourcing it would be
> difficult at best.
> 
> Based on what friends that work at sun tell me, the source can still
> be obtained internally if necessary...  I never pressed them for
> details on the rather curious way they put it (like I did just now).
> 
> Warner
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs