From: "Charles H Sauer (he/him)" <sauer@technologists.com>
To: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Prof Don Good [was Re: A fuzzy awk
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 12:53:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <958b0893-6829-41b9-a096-bf732e338ea1@technologists.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq=PCWKE1Pdkm7527rasqrcPTKUUY0wCWuMX3nDgP=b+K07SQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/25/2024 12:36 PM, Tom Perrine wrote:
> Another Gypsy user here...
>
> For KSOS-11 the kernel was described in SPECIAL - as a set of axioms and
> theorems. There was no actual connection between the formal
> specification in SPECIAL and the Modula code.
>
> Some of the critical user-space code for a trusted downgrade program, to
> bridge data from higher levels of classification to lower, was written
> in Gypsy. I visited UT Austin and Dr Good(?)'s team to learn it, IIRC.
> Gypsy was considered better in that the specification was tied to the
> executable through the pre/post conditions - and the better support for
> semi-automated theorem proving.
When I was transitioning from being a rock n' roller to computer science
student, I took my first undergraduate languages course from Don.
https://www.dignitymemorial.com/obituaries/austin-tx/donald-good-8209907
Charlie
--
voice: +1.512.784.7526 e-mail: sauer@technologists.com
fax: +1.512.346.5240 Web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
Facebook/Google/LinkedIn/Twitter: CharlesHSauer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-25 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-23 13:49 [TUHS] " Douglas McIlroy
2024-05-23 20:52 ` Rob Pike
2024-05-24 5:41 ` andrew
2024-05-24 7:17 ` Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-24 7:41 ` Rob Pike
2024-05-24 10:00 ` [TUHS] Is fuzz testing random? (Was: A fuzzy awk) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-24 11:56 ` [TUHS] Re: A fuzzy awk Dan Halbert
2024-05-25 0:17 ` Bakul Shah via TUHS
2024-05-25 0:57 ` G. Branden Robinson
2024-05-25 13:56 ` David Arnold
2024-05-25 17:18 ` Paul Winalski
2024-05-25 17:36 ` Tom Perrine
2024-05-25 17:53 ` Charles H Sauer (he/him) [this message]
2024-05-27 9:39 ` [TUHS] Testing an RE recogniser exhaustively. (Was: A fuzzy awk) Ralph Corderoy
2024-05-27 13:03 ` [TUHS] " Hellwig Geisse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=958b0893-6829-41b9-a096-bf732e338ea1@technologists.com \
--to=sauer@technologists.com \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).