From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: krewat@kilonet.net (Arthur Krewat)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:23:18 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] basic tools / Universal Unix
In-Reply-To: <20171030141645.6F81C18C0E7@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20171030141645.6F81C18C0E7@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <993c493c-e455-1a37-46d6-281394c6e7a1@kilonet.net>

Aw, I loved TECO - so much so that I wrote a version for every platform 
I used after that until I got into consulting for various different 
companies that used UNIX's of various flavors.

At some point in that transition, I learned vi. Now I wouldn't do 
without it.

The only detrimental thing about TECO to me, was that it was used to 
start off EMACS. ;)



On 10/30/2017 10:16 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>      > From: Ralph Corderoy
>
>      > Then the real definition, ending in an execution of the empty `q'.
>      > qq/4$^Ma2^[@qq
>
> Gah. That reminds me of nothing so much as TECO (may it long Rest in Peace).
>
>       Noel
>