The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Seiden <>
To: Paul Winalski <>
Cc: segaloco <>,
	The Eunuchs Hysterical Society <>
Subject: [TUHS] nassau smelting was Re: Current Ownership of 3B/WECo Computer IPs
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 13:46:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1177 bytes --]

hi, old friends (and i mean that both figuratively and literally)

the recent/continuing brouhaha involving lead sheathed cables made me wonder about
nassau smelting and refining in staten island (a sub of WEco which ended up with Lucent) 
(and apparently another location at  W. 29th st which was a superfund site for a while.)

wonderful chaplainesque photo:

also regarding the Staten Island location, quoting from

"The cleanup was to entail covering 450,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil with a thick, unbreakable plastic liner, as well as layers of clean soil.”

(hah, what could go wrong with that?)

> On Sep 11, 2023, at 11:34 AM, Paul Winalski <> wrote:
> Regarding the possible Western Electric -> Lucent -> Nokia IP path,
> has anyone tried contacting Nokia's legal department and asking
> whether they think they own the rights to the 3B/WECo computer IP, and
> if not, do they know who does (or might) own it?
> -Paul W.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2965 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-11 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-11  1:11 [TUHS] " segaloco via TUHS
2023-09-11  1:35 ` [TUHS] " alan
2023-09-11  2:02   ` alan
2023-09-11  3:17   ` Kevin Bowling
2023-09-11  1:43 ` Clem Cole
2023-09-11  2:57   ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-09-11  3:37     ` Clem Cole
2023-09-11 15:34       ` Paul Winalski
2023-09-11 17:46         ` Mark Seiden [this message]
2023-09-11 19:58           ` [TUHS] Re: nassau smelting was " Douglas McIlroy
     [not found]             ` <>
2023-09-11 21:06               ` Douglas McIlroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).