From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ronald Natalie)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:43:37 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] Algol68 vs. C at Bell Labs
In-Reply-To: <E1FF25D7-C7D5-4D27-A94B-85ADDC9708B6@cheswick.com>
References: <0f57f9d8248db61cba34372814d2f45e.squirrel@webmail.yaccman.com>
 <CAC20D2OT2k6TqvdBiCzM8PoJ6Bs4YZKZ1BPPT_czJT0koGMk_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOkr1zV9_vtMtZ65Cf-+qOAWYdHvpZ+-CXS9zz7Q5UaNDP5wFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1FF25D7-C7D5-4D27-A94B-85ADDC9708B6@cheswick.com>
Message-ID: <9D41DBD8-CD03-4F78-BED7-7FE1F7463F82@ronnatalie.com>

> 
> On the other hand, there was
> no excuse for a Pascal compiler to be either large, buggy, or slow, even before Turbo Pascal.
> 
I remember the Pascal computer on my Apple II used to have to use some of the video memory while it was running.