From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a6ee0e75 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id CAA0594C63; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:25:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21BD94926; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:25:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id ACC3894926; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:25:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [173.228.5.8]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D75594925 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:25:07 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mob.bitblocks.com (mob.bitblocks.com [192.168.125.11]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7185156E40C; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) From: Bakul Shah In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:24:52 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Richard Salz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) Subject: Re: [TUHS] "Fork considered harmful" X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On Apr 10, 2019, at 4:06 PM, Richard Salz wrote: >=20 > Any view on this? = https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/a-fork-in-the-road/ >=20 FWIW, my view is that any unix evolution that complicates fork() is/has probably going/gone in the wrong direction.