The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tfb@tfeb.org (Tim Bradshaw)
Subject: [TUHS] Bell Labs Holmdel site coming down
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:41:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C195F4F7-95E5-4B74-9696-92CACC751928@tfeb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605192016.25862.wes.parish@paradise.net.nz>


On 19 May 2006, at 09:16, Wesley Parish wrote:
> Three - there is usually a group of people willing to do this sort  
> of work -
> voluntarily - as the Groklaw example shows us, so it's often more  
> an inertia
> thingee than anything more serious.
>

I think this is off topic now, but the issue is that the company that  
signed the license agreements is the entity that is liable to be  
sued.  So it is their responsibility to ensure that they are safe  
from that.  That pretty much means it will cost them money, because  
*their* engineers and legal people will have to check things, and  
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the officers of the company (who  
carry the can if they get sued) that it's OK.

This doesn't mean it can't happen (as said in another branch of this,  
people within Sun have tried it before) but it does mean it's  
competing with other stuff for resource.  Would Sun (say) improve  
their chances of survival by  to open source SunOS 4 (which, although  
people romanticise it now, actually sucked, even at the time - it was  
only being better than early SunOS 5 and being a long time ago that  
make it seem nice) or to open source Java?  Or by doing neither?

Sorry for the rant, I'll shut up now.

--tim





  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-19 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-17 22:30 Stuart, Jon
2006-05-17 23:13 ` John Cowan
2006-05-18  1:42   ` Wesley Parish
2006-05-18  8:36     ` Tim Bradshaw
2006-05-19  8:16       ` Wesley Parish
2006-05-19 20:41         ` Tim Bradshaw [this message]
2006-05-18  8:50 ` Peter Jeremy
2006-05-18  9:42   ` Wilko Bulte
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-18 14:34 Michael Sokolov
2006-05-18  2:48 Norman Wilson
2006-05-17 22:40 Michael Sokolov
2006-05-17 21:39 patv
2006-05-17 23:27 ` Lyrical Nanoha
2006-05-17 19:56 patv
2006-05-17 20:48 ` Lyrical Nanoha
2006-05-17 15:29 tuhs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C195F4F7-95E5-4B74-9696-92CACC751928@tfeb.org \
    --to=tfb@tfeb.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).