The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brantleycoile@me.com (Brantley Coile)
Subject: [TUHS] Documentation on B language?
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:29:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C35ACC3D-BA7D-488C-B80D-FA7465EC65EF@me.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737rz6h6h.fsf@gmail.com>

Note that the novelty isn't that it adds or subtracts one with storage, but that it can be used in a more complex expression, along with a pre- and post-evaluation semantics. 

Also, Pascal post dates B. 

I offer this just as a clarification of the facts. I greatly admire both the languages of Thompson and Ritchie and those of Prof Wirth. I write a good bit of C code but all things being equal I would be programming in Oberon. But B's ++ and -- operators seem to be unique. 

Sent from my iPad

> On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:09 AM, Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> John Cowan <cowan at mercury.ccil.org> writes:
> 
>> Doug McIlroy scripsit:
>> 
>>> Various aspects of the language were borrowed from PL/I, BCPL and Algol
>>> 68. ++ and -- were novel operators. The reversal of Algol's assignment
>>> operators (e.g. -= became =-) was eventually repealed in C.
>> 
>> Algol 68, like Algol 60 and Pascal, used := (pronounced "becomes") for
>> assignment, and the Algol 68 assignment operators were spelled :+=,
>> :-=, etc. (pronounced "plus and becomes", "minus and becomes", etc.)
> 
> My copy of the Algol 68 report says "+:=" and "-:=", so it is
> questionable why Ken reversed them, especially since the ambiguity
> looks obvious.
> 
>> Pre-increment operators were already known in Lisp 1.5 long before;
>> they are now spelled incf and decf in Common Lisp.
> 
> AFAICS Algol didn't have them, but every Pascal I know had inc and dec.
> 
> -- 
> Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen at gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 13:01 Doug McIlroy
2016-03-08 18:00 ` John Cowan
2016-03-08 19:10   ` Andru Luvisi
2016-03-08 19:43     ` John Cowan
2016-03-08 23:13       ` Tim Bradshaw
2016-03-09 11:09   ` Christian Neukirchen
2016-03-09 11:29     ` Brantley Coile [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-09 21:34 Doug McIlroy
2016-03-09 21:43 ` John Cowan
2016-03-10 18:09   ` scj
2016-03-09 12:34 Noel Chiappa
2016-03-07  0:57 Norman Wilson
2016-03-07  8:39 ` Angelo Papenhoff
2016-03-07  0:20 Warren Toomey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C35ACC3D-BA7D-488C-B80D-FA7465EC65EF@me.com \
    --to=brantleycoile@me.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).